Jesus Green Association

2011-11-30T21:09:00.001Z

Here is the agenda for our AGM on December 6th.

AGM in December

2011-10-14T20:19:00.002+01:00

We would like to announce our forthcoming AGM on Tuesday 6 December. The venue is The Octagon Room at Wesley Church, 7.30-9.30 pm.

JGA committee meeting

2011-10-06T22:20:00.001+01:00

A committee meeting was held on 4th October. The committee is eager to restart Jesus Green Working Group meeting with Council officers.Minutes are posted under 'Minutes' above.

Lottery bid submitted

2011-09-03T13:45:00.000+01:00

The stage 1 lottery application final bid document was submitted at the end of August 2011. We are publishing here a number of documents from this submission:

Committee meeting held to discuss Lottery bid document.

2011-08-25T10:47:00.000+01:00

A JGA committee meeting was held on the 22nd August. This was to consider the final detail of the forthcoming lottery application. We have published minutes of the meeting, see the Minutes tab above

Special General Meeting held

2011-08-04T09:47:00.000+01:00

A Special General Meeting was held on the 27th July to discuss the forthcoming lottery bid. This is stage one of a two stage process. We have published minutes of the meeting, see the Minutes tab above.

Skate park approved

2011-02-02T19:30:00.002Z

Just a quick note to say the plans for a £65,000 or so upgrade of the skate park was approved on December 15

We have been assured the new footprint will not be any larger than the one there at the moment.

Our vice-chairman Martin asked the planning committee for the ramps to stay green, which found approval among members, but the officer is saying it is very hard to find a suitable green that blends with the surroundings given "the changing colours of the season".

The plans were given the go-ahead and the officer has been asked to consult with the JGA on the "muted colours" promised.

If we can't get green, what shall we go for. Maybe a dark grey?

What we don't want is a repeat of the ramp's first incarnation when it was white and looked like an iceberg stuck in the middle of the green

Cam Clean-up

2011-02-02T19:02:00.005Z

The Cam Cleanup, a popular event for local residents, community groups and the residential boating community, is returning in 2011.

This year's event will take place on Saturday 26th March, from 10am to 1pm, culminating with a BBQ.

The clean-up will take place on the 12 miles between Granchester Meadows to Bottishamlock, and volunteers are urged to sign up.

Here is a message from Luther Phillips, from Camboaters, one of the main organisers behind the event.

Every year Camboaters, 'Anglian Water's RiverCare' alongside Cambridge City Council and the Cam Conservancy organise the Cam Cleanup.

We invite volunteers to take part in this excellent opportunity to givethis much-loved river a helping hand, by participating in the riverCleanup.

The Cam Cleanup is the perfect excuse to get out there and dosomething for our fine City, as well as expressing our environmentalethic and collective love of rivers and wildlife.

The 2009 Cleanup saw more than 200 volunteers collect over 400 bags ofrecyclable and general rubbish from the river and its banks.

Hardworking grapple teams recovered a whopping 100 bikes from the riverbedand three motorised scooters were retrieved from Stourbridge Common.

This year we would like yourhelp to recruit volunteers, Team leaders and First Aiders for theMidsummer Common area.

Can you please circulate this letter amongst yourmembers

In the past only 30 volunteers (including, Team leaders andFirst Aiders) were required to litter pick the Midsummer Common area.

Please ask volunteers to email camcleanup@camboaters.co.uk expressingwhether they wish to be a volunteer, Team leader or whether they are aqualified First Aider.

Team Leaders andFirst Aiders will be required to attend a briefing event at the CouncilChamber, Cambridge Guildhall on, March 17th at 6.00 PM.

I look forward to hearing from you. Please phone me if you have any queries.

Kind regards, Luther Phillips07980 621 761

Partners: RiverCare - Andrew Walters, Project Manager andrew.walters@keepbritaintidy.org

Cambridge City Council - Bob Carter bob.carter@cambridge.gov.uk

Cam Conservators - Dr. Pip Noon,River Manager river.manager@camconservators.org.uk

'Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed people canchange the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has' Margaret Mead

Minutes of AGM 2010

2010-12-02T11:57:00.003Z

MINUTES Jesus Green Association AGM
Date: Wednesday, December 2 2010
Location: Wesley Methodist Church, Christ’s Pieces

Chairman’s welcome – 18 people + five committee members (chair Peter Constable, vice-chair Martin Thompson, secretary Jack Grove, treasurer Richard Price and Jesus College rep Anthony Bowen). Two councillors, Rod Cantrill and Daminen Tunnacliffe, also noted as present.

Apologies – Sarah Tovell, also received via email from Alf& Edith Styan, Elfrida Heath, Neil Anderson, Anne Bromley and Margaret Wright

Approval of minutes of AGM 2009

Brief run-through of topics for discussion by PC, including the issue of membership change and the move from subscriptions to ‘voluntary donations’. JG explained the reasons behind the change, unwieldy and bureaucratic etc. After an inquiry from the floor, it was agreed to send out an email detailing the changes and asking for members to contribute towards funds.

Treasurer’s report – RP outlined the accounts and noted the deficit for this year.
He also congratulated those who have taken part in efforts to beautify the JG lock island

David Edgar explained how the island had been tidied up under the supervision of Cam Conservators, with Pip Noon. Planting of shrubs and plants, etc

RP noted Dan O Donnell had cleaned out JG ditch and thanked him. Anne Garvey asked if Jesus College could contribute towards cleaning of ditch given the utility it receives from it. AB said bursar was aware of problem and was looking at joint working with council to improve its appearance.

David Edgar also reported on efforts to stem the number of BBQs on JG, with notices distributed to various shops outlining the rules against lighting of BBQs. Suggested an official sign is sent from association to stores in spring to warn people against lighting them on public spaces.

Chairman’s report

PC addressed tree issues, paths and HLF bid plans for the Rouse Pavilion, which would include the creation of a community cafe run by the community. Drainage of grass behind the lido would also be included in the bid, as would improvements to pathway and better bins for the summer time.
HLF bid is a collaboration with council, with the short term goals of improvements to the park, skate park and tennis courts also in the system.Bowls pavilion is due to be demolished soon.
Noted the council are good at clearing the green, though not always immediately on Sunday. Efforts should be made not just to clear up mess, but to stop people dropping litter through more bins, etc. Litter bins should be replaced as summer bins were unacceptable and get kicked about
Reported on work of JGA working group, which has adopted a joint strategy with Friends of Midsummer Common, which will be posted on the website. Future working parties would include FOMC.
Tree plan was noted, call for volunteers, including a replacement for JG as secretary. None was forthcoming and JG agreed to continue in interim while other is sought. JG explained the duties of the role.
Committee was nominated and accepted to continue in positions.

AB talked briefly about the input of skating community and parents into the JG working group, while Rod Cantrill, executive councillor for communities, explained the shakeup of management of city council and how it would improve JG with departments coming together. It is now controlled by Toni Ainley in charge of services and estates for open spaces.

General debate

Bruria Shachar-Hill said drainage should be a priority as waterlogged grass could impact on trees. Added she had approached several groups about BBQs with some ‘responding better than others’. Also notices about BBQ were not very clear

Point about inadequate notices was seconded by another member, adding that notices would only be adhered to if there was also enforcement

Anne Garvey said plane trees were fine in water, according to Cambridge tree expert Oliver Rackham. Signs were also too cautious about BBQs, creating confusion about what was a fire and what was a BBQ. AG also said she had contacted the council about BBQs to be told a BBQ was not a fire. Also objected to the large slab-like signs erected by Love Cambridge. Called for less ambiguous signs and said bins are often empty while litter is strewn on green.

PC said it was now understood that BBQs were fires and this had been made clear to police and council. Action could be taken but the enforcement issue had to be taken forward. Raised issue of designated BBQ areas like in Wandlebury or Lammas Land

Joye Rosenstiel supported idea of designated site, saying it was unrealistic to stop people from barbecuing on the green.

Other comment saying BBQ should have six inch legs to minimise damage, though PC commented that this did not stop the smoke issue.

AG said picnickers were losing out to a few BBQ people because of impact of smoke and chicken smells

Daniel Zeichner said BBQ facilities should be made available because many people lived in flats and JG was only open space available to them

Vote on BBQ issue. 8 in favour of designated zone, one for status quo and five against any BBQing on green

Richard Taylor raised issue of tree works on JG and whether the final plan proposed was that approved by west/central committee.

PC said only works were removal of three leylandii near tennis courts and reduction in height of leylandii at swimming pool by 3m a year for five years ahead of new hedge going in. Added that plans for planting trees near Lower Park Street had been removed because it would block out the view of the cottages

AG said leylandii removal at tennis courts were unnecessary as trees were healthy and screened the Magdalene College flats, leaving that corner very bare. PC said consultation was taking place and advised those with strongly held views to comment as AG had.

John Cooper said state of paths was a disgrace and he had written to council six years ago about the need for improvements and nothing had happend. Damien Tunnacliffe said he was meeting the county council officers on the issue this week and would report back. AB had pursued the path question too, but with no money forthcoming from council, the HLF was now a proposed rout. RT said inclusion of paths in lottery bid would allow council to wash hands of problem, as it had done in the past. PC said it was catch-22 –situation –with no money from council meaning double pronged approach was needed.

Rod Cantrill apologised to JC for lack of action, but times were hard now. However, council was delivering on skatepark improvements, which would go before the planning committee on December 9, for completion in early 2011 when ground was harder. Playground was also be done at the same time. Was not sure about the tennis courts and would get back to the association on the details of plans/timeline

Jeremy Purseglove, environmental expert, outlined some ideas for the central plane tree avenue, including removal of lampposts with lights in the trees, nice edging of path and damp meadowland ideas

Remarks that some council vans were destroying the path and grassy areas , RP responded saying council had pledged to use their smaller electric vehicle on JG.

PC raised idea of dedicated parks officer for four central Cambridge parks, including BBQ enforcement, +idea of hammerhead hard standing turning point at Victoria Avenue to stop damage.

Joye Rosenstiel raised issue of recycling points on the green

The committee’s membership of Cambridge Past, Present and Future was also raised (£35). Questioned why we were members when finances were so tight and they had plenty of money. BSH also said money could be better spent on JG because the association was not flush with money.

Chairman thanked people for coming and meeting ended at 9pm.

AGREED MINUTES OF DECEMBER 2009 AGM CAN BE FOUND UNDER THE BLOG ARCHIVE THAT MONTH

Upcoming AGM

2010-12-01T14:02:00.004Z

Jesus Green Association will hold its latest AGM today at Wesley Methodist Church at 7.30pm.

Among the issues under discussion will be the latest plans for tree landscaping on Jesus Green and Midsummer Common, repairs needed to paths which will deteriorate over the winter and issues that need addressing ahead of summer 2011.

While the association's committee is broadly supportive of the strategic plans for Jesus Green, we are worried about delivery of certain promised plans. Having agreed upgrades for the skateboard park, the children's play area and the tennis courts would be undertaken over the winter of 2010, ready in time for spring, there appears to be little action on these fronts.
Unless work begins soonish, then it is easy to see the delivery of these excellent projects delayed for another year.

After much consultation with various officers at the city council, the JGA are also broadly supportive of the amended plans for tree maintenance on the green. Instead of the 59 trees that could have been felled, only a few leylandii near the tennis courts will go, while the large leylandii hedge around the pool will be lowered substantially to make way for a hedge. This proposals, however, has attracted some concern among pool users concerned about a lack of screening while swimming.

There are also issues regarding the membership of JGA. Last year we agreed to impose a £2 subscription levy in an effort to a. establish a firmer membership list b. raise funds for our activities and c. cut dependence on the Grassroots Fund, which is bureaucratic and difficult to obtain funds from. However, our treasurer Richard Price has found collecting subscriptions difficult and unwieldly, with the game perhaps not worth the candle. With the axing of Grassroots funding by the Government, we might now consider switching to a form of voluntary funding from members, which bypasses the need to bureaucratic membership rules.

Peter Constable will also give an update on renovation plans for the Rouse Pavilion, on which the JGA is working up plans for a lottery funds bid.

Look forward to seeing all members there tonight.

OFFICIAL AGENDA

JESUS GREEN ASSCIATION-ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING
WESLEY METHODIST CHURCH-CHRIST’S PIECES DEC 3/2010. 7.30PM

1. WELCOME
2. APOLOGIES
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF AGM 3/12/09
4. MATTERS ARISING
5. TREASURERS REPORT AND APPROVAL OF INSPECTED ACCOUNTS.
6. THANKS TO VICTORIA ZEITLYN AND APPOINTMENT FOR 2011
7. CARE OF JESUS LOCK GARDENS, JESUS DITCH AND LITTER
8. SECRETARY’S REPORT
9. CHAIRMANS REPORT
10. NOMINATION AND ELECTION OF OFFICERS.CHAIRMAN-PETER CONSTABLE.VICE CAIRMAN-MARTIN THOMPSON.TREASURER-RICHARD PRICE. SECRETARY-JACK GROVE. MEMBERS –ALEX BUXTON,JO MORRISON,JEREMY PURSGLOVE, SYLVIA DANNREUTHER
11. GENERAL DEBATE
12. MEETING TO CLOSE BY 9.30 PM.

CHAIRMAN’S REPORT

THANKS TO OFFICERS AND MEMBERS OF COMMITTEE WHO HAVE WORKED SO HARD DURING THE YEAR.

WE HAVE MET 5 TIMES AND COVERED TOPICS :
WEBSITE, PRIORITIES FOR WORKING GROUP, ITEMS COVERED IN LOTTERY BID,NEW PLANTING BY LOCK KEEEPERS COTTAGE,TREE PLANTING, DEMOLITION OF BOWLS PAVILION, CHILDRENS PLAYGROUND REFURBISHMENT,LITTER, JESUS DITCH.SKATEBOARD PARK,LITTER BINS ROUSSE PAVILION,DRAINAGE, PATHSETC.
HERITEGE LOTTERY FUND PRE APPLICATION FORM AND MEETING
HELD RECENTLY.

MEETINGS OF JESUS GREEN WORKING GROUP :
MAINLY CENTRED AROUND PRIORITISATION OF ABOVE PROJECTS.
PREPARATION AND SUBMISSION OF JOINT STRATEGY DOCUMENT
BY JGA AND FOMC. WORKING GROUP IN FUTURE TO BE JOINTLY
WITH FOMC.

TREE REPLANTING AND IMPROVEMENT SCHEME ON JESUS GREEN.

NEED FOR VOLUNTEERS
DONATIONS

PSC
1/12/10

CITY COUNCIL'S TREE PLANS

2010-09-05T19:10:00.003+01:00

The hot topic of Jesus Green's trees has once again arisen.

The city council are currently consulting people on its long-term plans for the trees.

In short, there are proposals to chop down a lot of trees, including the horse chestnut trees on Victoria because they are said to be diseased. More controversially, there are also plans to fell the cherry tree avenue - about 20 years old - and replace it with new trees as it is felt the cherries are reaching the end of their lives.

Here is a copy of a Cambridge News article which sums up the issue very well. Below is the council's invitation for people to have their say, which must be done by September 10.

Iconic trees could be cut down after plans to take a chainsaw to Cambridge’s riverside parks were unveiled.

Options on the table for Jesus Green and Midsummer Common could see all of the horse chestnuts along Victoria Avenue chopped down immediately and replaced, and the cherry tree-lined avenue which runs diagonally from the lock to Park Parade razed ahead of the planting of small ornamental trees.

Another option is to replace the trees when they become unsafe.

Jesus Green and Midsummer Common are popular beauty spots but many species are randomly mixed and there is a risk of disease.

Peter Constable, chairman of the Jesus Green Association, said he was opposed to the removal of healthy trees for the sake of uniformity.

He said: “If it was decided to fell the trees, it would be a disaster – the green would look like a shorn sheep.

“The real beauty is in the present and the historic planting, which is what we should be trying to preserve and maintain.” Some £50,000 is available for planting in the coming months and also to plan the area’s long-term future.

A further option for Victoria Avenue is to fell alternate trees now and replace them, while young trees on Midsummer Common’s riverside path could be cut down and replaced with willows and black poplars.

Leylandii next to the tennis courts could be felled and replaced with limes, while copper beech trees on the edge of Park Parade could also be swapped for limes.

Leylandii next to the lido might be exchanged for a hedge, and willows could replace mixed species next to the Fort St George pub, and mixed trees to the west of Victoria Avenue between the river and Jesus College could be swapped for a single species.

Willows and limes could be planted on the Jesus Green towpaths, while Midsummer Common could get more trees to screen the new Brunswick School development and the public toilets.

There is not enough cash to implement all the options now so bosses at Cambridge City Council wants to hear what people’s priorities are.

Changes which are not implemented straight away could guide work over the coming decades.

Alistair Wilson, green space manager, said: “It’s often easier to manage a landscape if you have a long-term vision for it.

“We are trying to make a landscape for the future that recognises the heritage of the site.” Mr Constable described the cherry tree and horse chestnut avenues as “beautiful”.

He said: “The idea is to have a strategy that as trees are felled they are replanted.
“We should be exhorting people to have their say and avoid the chainsaw option because there are other options which are clearly better and would achieve much better results.”

COUNCIL INVITATION

The City Council has recently published proposals for new tree planting at Jesus Green and Midsummer Common.

Trees have an enormous positive impact on the city’s landscape, and we know it’s important to get tree planting right so that these important sites remain attractive and welcoming to residents and visitors.

We aim to restore the historic planting layouts, removing species that are not appropriate for the spaces, and providing a long-term, sustainable management solution for the trees.

This questionnaire is accompanied by a map of the locations concerned and we’d welcome your views on our tree management and planting proposals. In each question, we’ve left space which you can use to expand on your answer or give us more feedback.

You’ll find an electronic version of the survey on our website if you prefer to respond in that way, or you can just send us comments direct by emailing trees@greenrecreation.co.uk. You can also respond by post or fill in a form at our Customer Services Centre or at one of our exhibitions.

Please see details at the end of this form.

Please respond by 10th September 2010.

Litter update

2010-06-02T11:10:00.002+01:00

Pleasing though it is to see so many people enjoying Jesus Green in the first flush of summer, the litter situation is fairly horrendous.

The green has become a favoured destination for picnickers (in groups of 20 or more) who then try to place this waste in the public litter bins. While this is preferable than simply leaving mess strewn across the grass (which some groups do), the municipal bins cannot cope with what is essentially huge amounts of domestic waste. Visitors must attempt to take their waste home with them as it is not feasible to expect these small bins (even supplemented by extra ones) to contain all this waste.

And frankly the scenes seen following some hot weekends are simply disgraceful, with litter left all over the place. Council officials described a May weekend as teh worst they had ever seen Cambridge's greens.

Consideration needs to be given to enforcement if people refuse to tidy up after themselves.

And then there is the matter of disposible BARBECUES. These are not allowed on the green. Our association has been promised signs on each of the entrances to the green by the council but these have not yet materialised. Burn marks take up to two years to grow back and the dozens of patches left on the green on some weekends are not acceptable.

How draconian the council is willing to be in enforcing this rule is unclear. But unless a strong message is sent out, this practice will increasingly be seen as a Cambridge way of life, when it is clearly wrong (try lighting a BBQ in Central Park, NY, and see what happens).
And in the age of David Cameron's Big Society, in which individuals are asked to take responsibily for their environment rather than just relying on the state, maybe people might bee willing tell offenders about the rules when they set a BBQ being lit - though it would help if there was a sign to gesture towards.

So let's look after the green this summer

Spring update

2010-03-28T22:47:00.001+01:00

SPRING UPDATE

Spring is here and Jesus Green will soon become a hub of activity for socialising, sports, skateboarding, public events, swimming, boating and play for children once again.

The Jesus Green Association is happy to update the public on upcoming improvements to Cambridge’s best-loved open space, which will benefit the thousands of visitors who enjoy using it each year – particularly in spring and summer.

Tennis courts – Cambridge City Council have agreed to push ahead with the refurbishment of the green’s tennis courts. The existing hard courts will be resurfaced and two grass courts will be replaced with hard courts. Two grass courts will remain.
Procurement for the courts has begun and work is expected to take place in autumn/winter 2010.

Playground – plans to spend about £130,000 to refurbish the playground are well-advanced. Consultation is ongoing with parents about the type of equipment that they want to see – the park is expected to remain in the same location.
Work is set to start in autumn 2010 pending planning permission.

Skatepark – temporary planning permission for the park was made permanent earlier this year. A second planning application has been submitted for resurfacing and improvements to the ramp – work is expected to take place in autumn 2010. Skateboarders are in contact with council officers to ensure the right changes are made.

Lock-keepers island – using a small amount of money obtained from the Grassroots Fund, volunteers from the Jesus Green Association will be planting flowers in the lock keepers island this spring.

Rouse Pavilion – talks are underway about renovating the Rouse Ball pavilion, which houses the green’s public conveniences. These include the possibility of creating a community cafe at the pavilion. JGA is exploring possible funding streams, including the city council, lottery and Trinity College, which has expressed interest in improving the pavilion (named after former Cambridge councillor and Trinity don)

Plain tree avenue – plans to resurface the plain tree avenue have been adopted by the city council’s west/central area committee as one of its priorities, re the spending of section 106 money.

Drainage – JGA has written to the city council to say it would back any application to the lottery for a grant to improve drainage on the Victoria Avenue side of Jesus Green. Repairing collapsed drains under this area could potentially stop the area becoming a virtual flood plain in the winter and restore the grass, allowing football to be played there in the winter.

Wooden bowls pavilion – due to be demolished. Demolition date not yet known.

Trees – plans on the future of Jesus Green’s trees can be viewed on the association’s website. The JGA has made strong representations on this issue and will be working with city council tree officers to ensure future work on trees is transparent and in the best interest of Jesus Green users.
Jubilee Gardens – Cambridge City Council is undertaking a consultation about moving residential boaters off Jubilee Gardens – opposite Jesus Green tennis court area – and relocating them below to the area immediately below the weir.
River crusing vessels would instead be allocated this area – encouraging the use of the lock (stopping it from silting up) and bringing more tourist boaters on to Jesus Green.
A decision on making the switch will be made in October 2010 pending consultation.
To have your say contact officers at Cambridge City Council.

Other – plans for a “biodiversity zone” and “high-wire zone” for Jesus Green were dropped from a list of possible projects deserving section 106 money.

Jesus Green Association – at our annual general meeting in January we agreed to change the conditions of membership. Full members will asked to pay a £2 annual sub to help cover the costs of running the association, its various work, and it is hoped this will formalise our membership list.

Anyone who wants to join should email the address below – join up and get involved.

For all details about the JGA, our constitution and updates about issues affecting the green, go to www.jesusgreen.org/ or email secretary_jga@hotmail.co.uk

Jack Grove, JGA Secretary, March 28th 2010

Comments on changes to parks

2009-12-12T11:16:00.002Z

Anne Garvey, from the Don't Make It Jesus Less Green pressure group, was unable to attend the AGM on December 3, but has asked if these comments on the changes to the parks be communicated.

I wondered , as I couldn’t make the meeting tonight, whether there would be any gap to express the view, which many people attached to the Don’t Make it Jesus Less Green group have made to me, that moving the playground would be a mistake.

Mothers have explained that they like the walk there, the fact that there is a ‘defensible space’ around it – not criss crossed by pedestrian traffic as at the other end and sunnier.

Others interested in Jesus Green express the view that the two sides of the swimming pool are now balanced and moving the playground would concentrate activity at one end, a shadier one.

Safety concerns for children- the propsed move end would bring the children nearer the pavilion which in any incarnation will be haunted by homeless drinkers, now separated from the children side. Also the move would bring the children nearer the water and the fascination of the weir, the river , the lock, an additional hazard now not visible to them.

Waste, a large majority of people took the view that this is simply unnecessary and a waste of public money.

Children at Park Street School, in the top two classes, with whom I had an hour’s consultation, told me that they would prefer some more exciting play equipment for their age group. Would it be a good idea to place THIS at the darker kiosk end and separate younger children who need supervision from older children who can go to the park alone and play? The link would be the skate park but it’s then TOO old for the late primary school children to use.

Safety concerns about the late night use of the skate park and undesirable males hanging about there, this from parents of teenage girls who go down there.

Accounts for JGA 2009

2009-12-07T19:21:00.000Z

Jesus Green Association: Accounts for the period 30 October 2008 to 29 October 2009

1. Receipts and Payments Account

Receipts

Balance at bank on 30.10.08 b/f from 2007/08 422.80
Cash donation 10.00
Gross interest, Cambridge Building Society 0.53
Grant, City Council, Room hire for AGM 40.00
Grassroots Grant, Cambridge Community Foundation (see Note 1) 250.00
723.33

Payments

Public Liability Insurance Premium, 2008/09 37.95
Hire of room at Wesley Church for AGM on 02.12.08 40.00
Print-Out, bill for leaflets and public notices 192.80
Hire of room at Wesley Church for EGM on 17.03.09 (+ photocopying) 43.50
Public Liability Insurance Premium, 2009/10 45.75
Tax paid on CBS interest 0.11
Balance in Cambridge BS account on 29.10.09 c/f to 2009/10 363.22
723.33

2. Balance sheet as at 29 October 2008

Accumulated Association’s funds b/f from 2007/08 422.80
Surplus/ (Deficit) for year (59.58)
363.22

Cash in Cambridge BS account on 29.10.09 (see Note 2) 363.22
Accumulated Association’s funds c/f to 2009/10 363.22

Notes

1. The Jesus Green Association is pleased to acknowledge receipt of a grant towards running costs from Grassroots Grants which is managed by Cambridgeshire Community Foundation.

2. In February 2009 the Association’s ‘Community’ bank account with Barclays was closed and the funds transferred to a Community Account with Cambridge Building Society.

Hon. Auditor’s Statement
I have examined the bank and building society statements and other documents provided to me and, in my opinion, the accounts are accurate and give a fair and true representation of the financial position of the Association.

Victoria Zeitlyn

AGM report AND APPROVED MINUTES

2009-12-05T19:12:00.004Z

Dear JGA member,

The 2009 Jesus Green Association AGM took place at the Wesley Methodist Church on Thursday, December 3. In advance of formal minutes being posted on the website, here is a short summary of the key events and discussions at the meeting.

Possibly the most important item is that members agreed to levy an annual subscription of £2.

This is for several reasons. Firstly, financial. We have relied on a grant from the city council to cover the expenses incurred by the association and its committee. To obtain this money means jumping through many bureaucratic hoops and then we are not guaranteed the money. This should put the association on a better financial footing and allow us to possibly expand the scope of the association's activities.

Then there is the issue of members' engagement with the association. By imposing a token membership fee, it will increase people's sense of ownership towards the association. Instead of merely being a name on a mailing list, members will actively affirm their commitment to the association each year. This will also help us sort out who are active members and who no longer wish to be a part of the association, which will be useful to ensure we are quorate at future meetings.

As the JGA strengthens its position as a lobbying group (attending meetings, having a say on issues), it is important that we continue to engage with our members (so we can represent them properly) and the subs is an important part in this.

Can all those who wish to be a JGA member in 2010, please send their up-to-date contact details and £2 in cash to our treasurer, Richard Price, at 23 Portugal Street, Cambridge, CB5 8AW. Can people please drop this money round to Richard as soon as possible. I'll be sending out another reminder in January and doing a ring-round, so please help us to make the collection process as painless as possible.

Another item of note was announced by chairman Peter Constable. After some investigation, he had discovered the Rouse Pavilion (the toilets) were named after a Trinity College academic called Rouse Ball, who was also a long-serving councillor who provided the money for the building on the pavilion. Peter approached Trinity College about getting their support for refurbishing the pavilion and they have generously offered to provide some money towards it. This could be very useful in returning the pavilion to its former glory (it contains changing rooms, but much work needs doing).

We also agreed a strategic document detailing the association's priorities - and the basis on which the association would support any future lottery bid (see website).

There was also discussions over the green's rather abject playground - there is a report on this issue set to be discussed by the city council at a meeting in mid-January.

Peter Constable was elected again as association chairman, Richard Price treasurer, Jack Grove secretary and Martin Thompson vice-chairman. Anthony Bowen was coopted to the committee, representing Jesus College.

About 40 people and about 35 members attended the meeting, as well as councillors Tim Bick and Margaret Wright (Julie Smith sent her apologies as she was in Germany - the committee noted its thanks to her chairing the JGA working party over the year)

MINUTES OF JESUS GREEN ASSOCIATION-ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING
HELD AT WESLEY METHODIST CHURCH, CHRIST’S PIECES CAMBRIDGE
ON THURSDAY, DECEMBER 3RD 2009

THE CHAIRMAN WELCOMED ALL THOSE PRESENT INCLUDING MEMBERS AND TIM BICK, MARGARET WRIGHT AND JOY ROSENSTIEL AS LOCAL COUNCILLORS.
1. APOLOGIES WERE RECEIVED FROM COUNCILLOR JULIE SMITH WHO WAS THANKED IN HER ABSENCE BY FOR CHAIRING THE JESUS GREEN WORKING PARTY DURING THE YEAR.
2. THE MINUTE OF THE PREVIOUS AGM HELD ON DECEMBER 2ND 2008 AND THE EGM HELD ON17TH MARCH 2009 WERE APPROVED BY THE MEETING AND SIGNED BY THE CHAIRMAN.
3. THERE WERE NO MATTERS ARISING.
4. THE TREASURER’S REPORT AND INSPECTED ACCOUNTS WERE PRESENTED AND ACCEPTED. THE CHAIMAN ON BEHALF OF THE ASSCIATION THANKED VICTORIA ZEITLIN FOR INSPECTING THE ACCOUNTS AND HER APPOINTMENT FOR 2010 WAS APPROVED BY THE MEETING. THE TREASURER REPORTED ON THE CARE OF THE GARDEN ON JESUS GREEN LOCK. THREE VOLUNTEERS OFFERED TO HELP LOOK AFTER THE LOCK GARDEN.
5. THE SECRETARY’S REPORT INCLUDED A CALL FOR AN ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP SUBSCRIPTION OF £2 TO PUT THE ASSOCIATION ON A BETTER FINANCIAL FOOTING AND TO INCREASE MEMBERS SENSE OF OWNERSHIP. THIS RECEIVED THE SUPPORT OF THE MEETING AND MEMBERS WERE ASKED TO SEND THEIR SUBSCRIPRIONS AND CONTACT DETAILS TO THE TREASURER, RICHARD PRICE 23 PORTUGAL STREET CAMBRIDGE CB5 8AW.
6. THE CHAIRMAN REPORTED ON THE YEAR’S ACTIVITIES INCLUDING ACTIVITIES SURROUNDING THE HLF BID, THE EDF DEPOT PROPOSALS, THE MEETINGS OF THE JESUS GREEN WORKING GROUP AND THE ONGOING PLANS FOR THE UPGRADING OF THE CHILDREN’S PLAYGROUND, THE ROUSSE BALL PAVILION, THE SKATEBOARD PARK, TOILETS CAFÉ, JESUS DITCH (ONE MEMBER OFFERED TO HELP CLEAN OUT THE DITCH) ETC.
7. A GENERAL DISCUSSION FOLLOWED ON MANY ISSUES INCLUDING A STRATEGIC DOCUMENT DEALING WITH THE ASSOCIATION’S PRIORITES. THIS WAS UNANIMOUSLY ACCEPTED BY THE MEETING.
8. THE MEETING UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED AN ALTERATION TO CLAUSE 7 C) i) OF THE CONSTITUTION OF JESUS GREEN ASSOCIATION SO THAT THE QUORUM FOR A GENERAL MEETING SHALL BE REDUCED FROM ONE THIRD TO ONE FIFTH OF THE TOTAL MEMBERSHIP.
9. PETER CONSTABLE WAS REELECTED AS CHAIRMAN, MARTIN THOMPSON AS VICE-CHAIRMAN AND RICHARD PRICE AS TREASURER. ANTHONY BOWEN WAS CO-OPTED TO THE COMMITTEE AS THE REPRESENTATIVE OF JESUS COLLEGE.
10. THE MEETING CLOSED AT 10PM.

Strategic document agreed at AGM

2009-12-05T18:46:00.005Z

This statement, drafted by committee chairman Peter Constable, was agreed unanimously at the JGA AGM on December 3.

The statement affirm the beliefs and guiding principles of the association, and to create a firm mandate for the group's actions throughout the year.

ONGOING VISION STATEMENT FOR JESUS GREEN

WE ARE VERY LUCKY IN CAMBRIDGE TO HAVE SO MANY WONDERFUL GREEN OPEN SPACES WHICH NOT ONLY OFFER MASSIVE BENEFITS IN TERMS OF HEALTH, QUALITY OF LIFE AND WELL-BEING BUT ALSO BRILLIANT OPPORTUNITIES TO GET CLOSE TO NATURE AND ESCAPE THE STRESSES OF EVERYDAY LIFE. JESUS GREEN STANDS OUT AMONGST THE FINEST OF THESE OPEN SPACES AND IS USED BY TOWN, GOWN AND MANY THOUSANDS OF VISITORS.

HERITAGE IS NOT ABOUT THE PAST, IT IS ABOUT THE FUTURE AND IT IS IN THIS CONTEXT THAT WE SHOULD LOOK AT THE CONSERVATION,PRESERVATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE GREEN.THE IMMEDIATE AND MEDIUM TERM PROJECTS IDENTIFIED BY THE JESUS GREEN WORKING GROUP (SEE SEPARATE DOCUMENT) ENHANCE THE AREA AND ADD TO THE BENEFITS TO HEALTH, QUALITY OF LIFE AND WELL-BEING.

THE COMPLETION OF THESE PROJECTS WITHIN THE SPECIFIED TIME SCALE AND WITHIN AVAILABLE RESOURCES IS CHALLENGING. JESUS GREEN ASSOCIATION WILL SUPPORT THE COUNCIL IN SEEKING ADDITIONAL FUNDING UNDER THE PARKS FOR PEOPLE OR SIMILAR SCHEME TO CARRY OUT ONLY THE MAJOR WORKS OF TREE PLANTING, DRAINAGE AND THE WORK ON THE SIDES OF THE PATHWAYS
NECESSARY TO PREVENT IMPACT DAMAGE TO TREE ROOTS AND GRASS VERGES.

HOWEVER THE ASSOCIATION WOULD NOT WISH TO SEE THE AVAILABILITY OF FUNDING FOR SHORT-TERM IMPROVEMENTS TO THE GREEN FROM SECTION 106 AND OTHER EXISTING PUBLIC SOURCES BEING THREATENED BY THE NEED FOR MATCHED FUNDING FOR THE MAJOR WORKS MENTIONED ABOVE.

ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING
3RD DECEMBER 2009

JGA AGM agenda

2009-12-02T22:17:00.001Z

JESUS GREEN ASSOCIATION - ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING

Octagon Room, Wesley Methodist Church, Christ’s Piece, Cambridge

Thursday, December 3 at 8.15pm

1. Welcome
2. Apologies
3. Approval of AGM and EGM minutes
4. Matters arising
5. Treasurer’s report and approval of inspected accounts. Thanks to Victoris Zeitlin and appointment for 2010. EDF energy plans. Care of garden on Jesus Lock.
6. Secretary’s report. Future of website. Subscriptions.
7. Chairman’s report

PC to address work by JGA on HLF situation and JGA meetings during year, Jesus Green Working Group and ongoing future of the plans using council funds, playground upgrade plans, concerns of JGA over procedures (public discussion) VOLUNTEERS : for clearing Jesus Ditch, litter collection, clear rubbish.
Rousse Ball pavilion plans for upgrading toilets and café etc

8. Nomination of officers, election of officers
9. Suggestions from the public, debate
10. Meeting to close by 10pm.

Restatement of JGA mission

2009-12-02T22:12:00.001Z

In response to the Heritage lottery Fund and The BIG Lottery Fund decision to reject the bid of £3.3 million by Cambridge City Council for lottery funds for the wholesale development of Jesus Green, the Chairman of Jesus Green Association, Peter Constable comments:-
“ Jesus Green association, through its members, has been strongly opposed to the wholesale formal development of the Green and are relieved that the threat of reduction in the grassed area, the decimation of the tree population and the provision of wider intrusive pathways and piazza areas is now somewhat diminished.

The main concern was that the £4.4 million of changes would radically alter the character of the historic unspoilt green space, turning it into a “theme park” consisting of segmented amusement areas (high wire zone, ornamental gardens, ponds, adventure playground). It appears the Lottery Committee has had similar concerns about the “heritage” gains of the bid. Our argument was the high concept ideas behind the bid ran contrary to the historic “countryside in city” character of Jesus Green.

Jesus Green association is pleased that the City council has confirmed that the matched funding of £1.1 million is still available and that meaningful consultation will take place on how these funds and general annual maintenance monies are spent.
Membership of the Association reflects a wide spectrum of users of the Green and we take this into account in putting forward our concerns and ideas.

The association will strongly support conservation, preservation and regular effective maintenance of the Green. In particular it will support maintenance and drainage of the grassed areas, a comprehensive tree conservation and replacement strategy (no unnecessary felling of healthy trees), and maintenance/refurbishment of the tennis courts, swimming pool children’s play area, the riverside area, the brookside area and the skateboard park. Jesus Green association will also support the redevelopment of the Rouse Pavilion to provide up to date café and toilet facilities.
It would also welcome discussions on a litter enforcement strategy to make the Green a litter free area for all to enjoy.

I hope that the rejection of the Council’s bid can be used as a platform to bring about effective consultation and action on the maintenance and urgent improvements to Jesus Green to ensure that this beautiful heritage site retains its peaceful open spaces for all to use in an informal way.

Peter Constable
16th April 2009.

AGM time change

2009-11-15T23:21:00.001Z

The time of the AGM has been changed to 8.15pm on Thursday, December 3.

Bonfires and barbecues on Jesus Green

2009-11-02T23:32:00.002Z

The JGA has put up a notice about barbecues on the green in the summer - it is illegal but many people don't know this or simply know that no action will taken against them

Just to clarify it is against the bylaws that were constituted when the green was made a common in 1985.

Anyway a meeting regarding Midsummer Common in April touched upon these issues

Here is a quick synopsis:

The main focus was the problem of illegal fires on Midsummer Common where this is clearly a major problem (people pinch pallets and other rubbish from building sites to
build large bonfires) but damage to grass on Jesus Green by instant
barbecues was also mentioned.

It is in fact illegal to light a fire of any sort on common land and that includes the instant barbecues of the sort sold by the supermarkets and widely used on Jesus Green. The police appear to be unaware of the law and have been telling people who ask that they may light fires. (see List of Tasks one of which is to educate the police!)

Cllrs Julie Smith and Tim Bick both raised the very sensible question of
whether it might be possible to find way for people to continue to have
barbecues on Jesus Green without damaging the grass (and without falling
foul of the law).

Pleas made for larger and more rubbish bins on Jesus Green.

JGA response to proposed parks strategy

2009-11-02T23:27:00.000Z

Response to draft Parks & Open Spaces Strategy 2009-2013 from Jesus Green Association

The deadline for comments during the summer ‘recess’ leaves little time to canvas the views of our members, so this is being copied to them in case they wish to add their own comments or take issue with this response on their behalf. However, in this response we have done our best to represent the wide range of users of Jesus Green.

Overall this is an aspirational document containing many laudable objectives only some of which will be achievable in the short to medium term. Some may not be achievable at all, for example "natural spaces have to be in the right places-within five minutes walking distance of the home" this will not always be achievable in an already built environment. The acid test will therefore be the manner in which this strategic document is translated into a short, medium and long term action plan.
It would be helpful if firm assurances were given to stakeholders that similar detailed consultations will be carried out before any specific aspects of the strategy are implemented.

Although we have certain criticisms of the wording of the draft (see section 2 below) we warmly welcome the inclusion of such statements as the intention to address local concerns about maintenance and to encourage more involvement of groups like the JGA.

Our detailed response follows your suggested format:

NATIONAL REGIONAL AND LOCAL CONTEXT.

We have already commented above on the accessibility within five minutes walking distance. Such a provision could be seriously wasteful of resources and spread the costs of maintenance, provision of services and security far too thinly.

Whilst growth and investment provision through section 106 monies is essential, there is also the maintenance, conservation and preservation of the historic green assets of Cambridge which should share in this 106 funding. Whilst we disagree with encouraging car access to central green spaces, enhanced public transport will give effective access to many more local families.

The key issues on page 8 cover all the essential aspects and we are pleased to see mention of "enhancement" of the parks and commons being achieved through the use of conservation and management plans. We are opposed to the spoiling of these spaces by the partitioning of selected areas for specialist purposes and the erection of buildings etc.
One large omission is the regulation of these open spaces by local government. Although local by-laws covering littering etc are available there is little or no indication that this is either pointed out or put into practice on the greens parks and commons, as far as behaviour, littering and good conduct are concerned.

UNDERSTANDING SUPPLY

4.3 Assessing quantity.
Does natural and semi natural space include allotments and would more allotments satisfy the shortfall in parks and open spaces? If so, would allotments and privately owned sites secured for community use fill the gap. The strategy document is not clear.

4.4 Assessing quality.
It is difficult to comment without seeing the "further text". No doubt this will be sent.

4.5 Assessing value.
This section seems to meet all requirements in Cambridge but we await the promised completion of conclusions.

4.6 Assessing accessibility.
We have commented on car access above. Strategy should focus on public transport facilities for wider access. This section also awaits completion of conclusions.

UNDERSTANDING DEMAND AND NEED

5.4 It is very satisfying to see that Jesus Green has risen strongly as peoples preferred park. It is therefore even more urgent to increase regular and effective maintenance and support conservation and preservation in this area and other historic open spaces.

The KEY ISSUES are fundamentally sound and it is appropriate that where external funds are sought then the need has been identified. However please add AND AGREED to the final key issue.

PARTNERSHIPS AND THEMATIC WORKING.

6.4 It is good to see that the strategy includes Friends Groups and volunteers. This will help the whole community to show individual and group responsibility.

The first KEY ISSUE is fine but the second one needs a note of caution added to the effect that the general use of open spaces for the use of the people should not be compromised by the needs of events which reduce usable space for significant periods and that income from these events should include a "maintenance and refurbishment" contribution.

SUMMARY OF EMERGING ISSUES

All stated are relevant although there is a certain amount of repetition and overlap.(see detailed notes in section 2 of this response)
Among the most important issues are: a) b) e) h) n) o) and q)
The five most important being:
a) b)e) n) and q)

Section 2
Specific comments on text

Page 8 section 3 end (and issue (m) in the summary of emerging issues):

"The need to raise the profile, understanding and value of parks and open
spaces in Cambridge". Is the intention to say:

"The need to increase public awareness and appreciation of parks and open
spaces"?

P10 Section 4.2, Standards of provision, assessment of quantity of open
spaces is based on the populations estimates in Table 1 on page 7 which
includes an estimate for the city's population of 113,900 for 2006. It is
not clear whether this figure includes:

(a) undergraduate and graduate students of Cambridge University most of
whom also have access to extensive university and college sports
facilities;

(b) undergraduate and graduate students of Anglia Ruskin University who
may not have access to such facilities.

The combined student bodies of these universities are a significant
proportion of the city's population (perhaps 20-25%) and the strategy
needs to recognise this and to state whether or not their needs are
recognised and addressed.

P14
Of considerable concern is the weight attached in Section 5 to
the data derived from " . . . three surveys (two by post, one by 'phone
with limited sample size) in which users of parks were asked questions to
explore aspects of the way they use parks."

The author of para 5.2 states that " . . . The answers are not necessarily
comparable in pure statistical terms because of different methodologies and
slightly different wordings . . ." but then goes on in sections 5.2 to 5.7
inclusive to use percentages derived from the responses in the surveys to
identify trends in the use of parks and open spaces. Without sight of the
data it is hard to comment but it would seem wise to treat the trends and
inferences in these sections with extreme caution.

Page 21: The second sentence of the second para in Section 7.5 at the top:

"There is therefore a tension between the need to conserve the historic
open spaces in the city centre and the need to improve and enhance spaces
in the residential suburban neighbourhoods."

It does not seem appropriate to use the word ‘tension’ here. The sentence quoted above can be made more relevant by deleting the words
'tension between the'.

P23
Further editing work needs to be done to the 22 emerging issues. As drafted they contain repetition and are a mixture of what might be described as broad aims such as:
(m) "The need to raise the profile, understanding and value of parks and
open spaces in Cambridge" which, as stated in 6 above, we think would be
better stated as "The need to increase public awareness and appreciation of
parks and open spaces".

and measurable objectives such as

(a) "Address local concerns about standards of provision and maintenance".

It would be better to separate these broad aims from the objectives. It
would also be helpful to subdivide both under headings such as:

Management issues (e.g. range of provision, standards of provision,
standards of maintenance)

Finance (funding of maintenance, funding of additions/improvements to green
spaces)

Engagement with citizens.

There is much repetition - the same thing being said in different ways. For
example, (a), (b), (c), (d), (j), and (n), all involve engagement of some
sort with citizens.

Another example is provided by (e) "Revise conservation and management plans of key parks and open spaces" and (r) "Develop conservation, habitat and management plans for parks and open spaces".

Once the strategy document has been finalised, the JGA looks forward to playing a full part in helping to formulate the action plan to follow.

Submitted on behalf of the Jesus Green Association 13/8/09
Peter Constable Chair
Martin Thompson Vice-Chair
Richard Price Treasurer

Skateboard competition

2009-11-02T22:52:00.002Z

A skateboard competition took place at the Jesus Green skatepark on Saturday, September 26.

This was organised by Chypps, the young people's play activities team at Cambridge City Council.

This is exactly what the way the green should be used and a very good way to engage young people. It also follows a fantastic programme of events over the summer by this team, which kept thousands of children occupied and delighted during the holidays.

Children, parents and child care workers who used the scheme it was fantastic and let's hope they get the recognition they so richly deserve for their efforts.

DIsquiet over consultation process

2009-11-02T22:30:00.002Z

Committee members of the JGA have written to the city council as we are concerned
about the current consultation over the new Jesus Green plans

The council is consulting a whole range of different organisations and groups, but the
JGA (set up as an independent voice to represent those with an interest in JG) has not been included in the list of those to be consulted.

The only mention of the JGA in the document is under 'Report' is where we learn that a report of the findings will be distributed to JGA (among others).

This only reinforces our suspicion that the council is trying to sideline the Association while driving an agenda that we might not want to support.

The play area questionnaire seems to cover the key questions but we are concerned about the following question in the extremely brief skateboard area questionnaire:
>
> "Would you like to see some equipment aimed at teenagers on Jesus Green?"
> Yes/No "If yes, what kind of equipment would you like to see?"

It seems pretty obvious that the answer will be "Yes" and that this will provide the council with the 'evidence' it needs to justify the creation of the 'adventure pay area' that keeps cropping up - in the lottery bid, the priorities list etc.

We have always expressed concern about this because details of what the council has in mind have never been forthcoming and we have doubts about whether such a thing is appropriate for the Green. The question of whether or not Jesus Green is the right place for something like this has never been raised by the council or discussed.

Although the framework is headed: "Consultation with children, young people and parents/carers re Jesus Green Play Park and Skate ramp" the very loaded question about equipment aimed at teenagers makes it clear that the council's thinking extends well beyond these two areas.

It would be worth reminding ourselves of the strongly supported views expressed at the JGA's two recent and well attended public meetings - our AGM on Tuesday 2 December last year and our extraordinary general meeting on Tuesday 17 March. The minutes of the AGM include this statement

" . . . there was much desire for maintenance and improvement of what
exists, but great dislike of novelty . . ."

A document opposing development of the Green, including an adventure play area, but supporting conservation, preservation and regular effective maintenance (incl skate board and children's play areas) was unanimously adopted at our EGM

Our next AGM will be on Thursday 3 December at which it would be good to express gratitude and support for things that the Association has been pressing for. However, we shall not hesitate to offer our members the chance to discuss issues that are of concern such as any plans to 'develop' the Green.

Good news on path

2009-11-02T21:54:00.002Z

It appears the JGA's pleas for maintenance on the green have finally been listened to.

Plans to repair the plane tree avenue path have been adopted by the city council for possible section 106 cash. In terms of city-wide priorities, this path is second on the list behind the refurbishment of the Kelsey Kerridge climbing wall (surely something of a niche activity).

That means Jesus Green could be in line for some planning gain money for next year - a better scenario than the previous situation where Jesus Green was denied any money at all because of the distant promise of millions (for a scheme we didn't want)

Well done to Tim Bick for speaking at the West/Central committee in support of Jesus Green.

Interesting how well the Newnham ward does well under the West Central area priorities. Six out of the seven area spending commitments are for Lammas Land (including improved kiosk, benches, river access shelter, shelter and paddling pool). Saying that their tennis court doesn't get a look in and it's just as bad as ours.

Jesus Green AGM

2009-11-02T21:41:00.002Z

The 2009 Jesus Green annual general meeting will take place in the Octagon Room of Wesley Church, in King Street, Cambridge, will take place on Thursday, December 3 at 7.30pm.

Please inform all JGA members and anyone else who is interested in the green or who wishes to become a JGA member.

An agenda for the meeting will be published on this site shortly

Shocking state of the grass tennis courts

2009-07-26T22:40:00.005+01:00

I don't know if anyone has tried to play tennis recently on Jesus Green. If they have, good luck to them.

You will be lucky to get on one of the two hardcourts, which are constantly occupied by foreign language students tapping the ball to each other. This is fine but you will never get tired doing this, so such games can last hours and students have not compunction to get off after half an hour if people are waiting.

The lines on these courts have not been painted this year and are therefore hugely worn out and barely visible. There is also no winder on the net so it has inevitably lost tension and sagged below the required level. This leads to people making rather pathetic efforts to raise the net just so they can have a game (either attach winders or supervise the courts and have someone raise the nets when required, if that is the approach).

Then there is the terrible state of the grass courts. These are the worst they have ever been. I played a few decent matches on those courts two years ago, but the persistent neglect by the council means they are now unplayable. The ball bounces unevenly and jags off the surface at unpredictable and strange angles. This is part of grass court tennis (as McEnroe tells us at Wimbledon) but for every bounce. The nets are also badly damaged and the fences vandalised, encouraging footballers to play on it.

This is because there is virtually no maintenance of the courts. They are mowed to an acceptable level, but there is no pre-season care (rolling or spiking, which is essential) which means the court can never be flat. Street Scene say this is because there is no roller (an excuse put forward for the proposed scrapping of the Hobbs cricket pitch), but really there is no will to get the courts up to a playable level. Offers for volunteers to take over the maintenance were ebuffed due to health and safety reasons.

Sadly it's time to scrap the grass courts. These were great fun for many years but are just too awful to play on anymore. It is a shame to lose the city's last grass courts but, in truth, we have already lost them because they are so bad.

Bring on the proposed £80K pair of hard courts so at least tennis fans can get have a chance of getting a game.

Midsummer Fair problems and police action

2009-07-10T23:18:00.004+01:00

This was a letter sent by Inspector Ian Lyons regarding the latest Midsummer Fair

Dear residents,

I am Inspector Ian lyons from the Cambridge City reactive policing teams. I have the responsibility of looking after community reassurance during the forthcoming Midsummer Fair from Wednesday,24th June 2009 until Monday, 29th June 2009.

It is paramount for me to hear what your concerns are regarding this summer fair, in particular the way it affects you or your local community. Once aware of these problems I can address them with you and take positive action.

So far feedback from residents shows concerns around the following:

General disorder in the neighbourhood

Loud parties causing disruption to the community after the Fair has finished.

High volumes of traffic and parking issues

Shoplifting

A lot of work has already been done with organisers and other partner agencies to minimise these issues. These include joint high visible patrols throughout the periphery of the Common.

For the fair site itself, this is subject to a planned police operation which has been refined over many years to deal with incidents on the site.

The fair can also have a wider effect on the local community & because of this we will have additional staff on duty many of whom will be your local officers, & the Rural Community Action Team. Whose role is to deal with the issues that affect the wider community. Please be assured that new police powers relating to alcohol based disorder will be used to direct people to leave the area in fitting circumstances - failure to do so may result in their arrest.

During the week leading up the fair the city council event management will be on site. They will hold daily meetings on the site at 10:00hrs to which community representatives are invited to attend, the local police officers & community support officers will also attend. There will be signs placed out when community support officers are patrolling the area & I would urge you to make contact with them if you see them, any information will be greatly appreciated by them.

If you have concerns relating to a parking , then 'Legion Parking' can be contacted on 01223458500. Having already spoken to the Contract Manager of Legion, I have been assured that there will be an increase of patrols from their officers throughout the week.

During the week please feel free to use e-cops to pass messages to the Neighbourhood Officers. When the fair has finished, I would appreciate it if you are able to give the Neighbourhood Teams some feedback as to your general concerns relating to the Fair. Through this I will then be able to look ahead for next year.

Many thanks,

Ian Lyons

T/ Inspector

Jesus Green lock

2009-07-10T23:13:00.006+01:00

Repairs to the Jesus Green lock are currently taking place and will run until the end of July.

River manager Phillippa Noon has asked JGA members to suggest ways to improve the lock island garden. If anyone has ideas, then please email us and we will send on the comments to her

Letter from Phillippa Noon

With reference to our brief conversation following the Jesus Green Stakeholder liaison workshop at the Wesley Chapel on 20 April, I can now confirm that the Conservators are due to suspend navigation through Jesus Lock for the period Friday 19^th June to Friday 31^st July inclusive.

During this period of closure, the old wooden v-doors will be lifted out and taken to a specialist workshop in Halifax.

There, they will be copied by craftsmen using new oak timbers, thence returned to the lock in late July.

A mobile crane is to be used to perform the lifting operations, positioned beside Jesus Green Lock-Keeper’s House.

In order to ensure public safety during operations, we have requested a public footpath closure along the frontage of Jesus Green Lock-Keeper’s House and Jesus Green footbridge on the following dates:Wednesday 24 June 2009, 8am to 6pm Tuesday 28 July 2009, 8am to 6pm.

We have allowed a generous time ‘window’ however, it is most likely that both footpaths will be reopened before the end of the afternoon.

Fencing will demarcate the site working area and signs will be in place to re-direct pedestrians and cyclists. Clearly, the footpath closure on both days will have an impact upon local residents and we should be grateful for any assistance which you might lend us in communicating this closure to local residents.

Pedestrians and cyclists wishing to seek access to and from Chesterton Road will have to use alternative river crossings (Victoria Bridge or Magdalene Bridge). Standard footpath closure notices will be displayed, in accordance with the County Council’s requirements, in due course.

Finally, the lock gate refurbishment project offers us with the opportunity of reviewing the design of the garden on the lock island. If the Residents’ Association has any views on the planting scheme, we should appreciate your feedback. Thank you for your attention and assistance.

Yours sincerely

Dr Philippa E. Noon

River Manager

EDF Energy depot latest

2009-07-10T22:36:00.004+01:00

The JGA was delighted when the council threw out plans by EDF Energy to install a storage depot on the green near Park Street (see below)for at least 18 months.

But the work has to take place and there needs to be some viable storage alternative.

The JGA had suggested EDF Energy use the car park of the empty DWP building on Carlyle Road. EDF Energy seemed very keen on this site, but the DWP does not want to relinquish the building for this use, although the building has been empty for some time.

Other sites have now been identified on Madingley Road, but these are not exactly convenient and could be therefore unsuitable. If EDF cannot find a site, it could conceivably use emergency powers to gain control of an area of public land for its uses (not sure what legislation they would use but there must be something like this possible)

In the meantime, the council have prepared a report on ownership and public land issues relating to the green. This report is much welcomed as it helps to clarify some of the issues that relate to this application.

It was presented to the community services scrutiny meeting on June 25.

Report by Alistair Wilson to Cllr Julie Smith on proposed use of Jesus Green by EDF Energy

Non-Key Decision

1. Executive Summary

EDF Energy is seeking to use part of Jesus Green for a temporary site compound for works required at Thompson’s Lane sub station. Jesus Green is owned by the City Council, and is registered common land. For EDF to be able lawfully to use Jesus Green for this purpose, it would need:

i) Planning consent;

ii) Consent from the Secretary of State under Section 38 of the

Commons Act 2006; and

iii) The City Council’s consent as landowner.

This report asks the Executive Councillor whether the Council should give its consent as landowner to this proposed use of Jesus Green.

2. Recommendations

The Executive Councillor is recommended to refuse permission for the use of part of Jesus Green by EDF Energy as a temporary site compound.

3. Background

Planning Application

3.1 EDF Energy made a Planning Application (09/0087/FUL) on the 12th February 2009, through their agent MLM Consulting Engineers to use part of Jesus Green for a temporary site compound for works required at Thompson’s Lane sub station.

3.2 The application proposed a site compound to be in place for eighteen months, in connection with work to renew the electricity substation in Thompson’s Lane. The application proposed the area be surrounded by a 2.4m-high plywood hoarding, to be painted olive green. Within this would be space for storage of materials and plant, ten car or van parking spaces, and four demountable buildings in two stacks of two, to provide office space and

Report Page No: 2 toilets. At the south-west end of the site, a lay-by for delivery vehicles would be created alongside Park Parade, separated from the trees by a post-and- rail fence. The whole area would be surfaced with hardcore.

3.3 At the end of the period of work on the substation, the site area would be recovered with topsoil and seeded with grass, and the whole avenue of cherry trees to Jesus Lock felled and replaced with new flowering cherry trees.

3.4 This was a valid planning application accompanied by the correct certificate of ownership, and it was considered by the City Council in the same way as any other planning application.

3.5 The Planning Officer recommended refusal.

3.6 The application was refused by the Development Control Manager acting under delegated powers on the 9th April 2009, and the letter of determination was sent the same day. EDF have the right of appeal

Pre Planning Application Considerations

3.7 Previously EDF have worked on Jesus Green to lay cables which they have statutory powers to carry out this work. A payment was made with this way leave agreement, to permit the work. These statutory powers do not extend to placing a compound on Jesus Green in connection with works at another location.

3.8 Other sites considered before making the planning application include Jesus Green on the eastern side adjacent to Victoria Avenue, this was discounted due to disruption to traffic, the route taken from the site to Thompsons Lane, and for arboricultural reasons.

3.9 A vacant site at the top of Castle Hill, was discounted as it was too small.

Status of Jesus Green

3.10 Jesus Green is designated as Common under the City of Cambridge

Act 1985, Part II, Section 7. As registered common land, Jesus Green has

special statutory protection and the land could not be used as a compound

without the approval of the Secretary of State, under the Commons Act

2006. EDF indicated on the 19th March 2009 their intention to submit an

application under Section 38 to the Secretary of State.

3.11 The City Council owns Jesus Green and therefore has the same rights

as other landowners, subject to not interfering with public rights that attach to

common land. Therefore, the City Council’s consent would be needed for the

proposed use by EDF even if the latter obtains planning consent and

Report Page No: 3

consent under the Commons Act. Subject to statutory powers (such as

compulsory purchase), the City Council is entitled to refuse or permit the

use, or access to, Jesus Green for purposes unconnected with its status as

common land.

City Council considerations

3.12 The City Council has to decide as landowner whether it will or will not

permit this use of the common regardless of whether the Section 38 consent

can be obtained.

3.13 The proposal to use Jesus Green as a temporary compound will have

significant impact on users and their enjoyment of the amenity. There is no

balance to drawn as the strategic importance of work to the substation has

not been detailed.

3.14 The Friends of Jesus Green have discussed this proposal at an

Extraordinary General Meeting and are opposed to the use of part of Jesus

Green.

3.15 Representations to the Planning application were received from:

• Park Street C of E Primary School

• Park Street Residents Association

• Save Our Green Spaces Cambridge

• Savills acting on behalf of St John’s College

3.16 The representations can be summarised as follows:

• Loss of open space of recreational importance

• Harm to the character and appearance of the conservation area

• Loss of trees, including a memorial tree

• Difficulty of ensuring proper restoration of the Green afterwards

• Other sites could be used, such as Park Street car park

• Work should have been undertaken before 24 Thompson’s Lane

was developed

• Site is Common Land

EDF Consideration post Planning Application determination

3.17 EDF and their Agent are currently considering the car park of Henry

Giles House 73-79 Chesterton Road as a suitable alternative.

Purpose of report

3.18 This report is brought to Community Services Scrutiny Committee to

determine whether or not the City Council will permit the use of Jesus Green

for a works compound for EDF work.

5. Background papers

The following background papers were used in the preparation of this report:

• Report by the Planning Officer in relation to 09/0087/FUL

• Correspondence from EDF

• Correspondence with Friends of Jesus Green

Jesus Green working party visit 15.6.09

2009-07-10T22:17:00.006+01:00

Two JGA members attended the council's second Jesus Green working group on June 15.

This was a chance for those involved with the green to have their say on how the green can be improved. The JGA was the only key stakeholder present, although representatives from the rowing association, cam conservators, beer festival, councillors Tim Bick, Mike Dixon and Julie Smith and several council officers were there.

The JGA feels more encouraged by the approach being adopted by the council. Officers say this is now 'not HLF led' - this could mean the 'grandiose' schemes criticised by members in the past are no longer the priority of the council (as there is no money for them).

However, it could mean the council are still keen to pursue the individual projects one-by-one, rather than hoping for a mega-transformation of the green.

After the hiatus of the HLF, we are now glad the emphasis can return to proper maintenance of the green and the improvement of existing facilities.

The meeting heard how there will be better cross departmental cooperation at the council to ensure better maintenance, while there will be four inspections a year, in which defects will be identified for fixing. Street Scene officers were also at the meeting and seem to keen to continue their excellent work caring for the green, with the JGA requesting extra bin collections in the summer

Jesus Green Association making a difference

2009-07-10T22:02:00.002+01:00

JGA treasurer Richard Price spotted a hole in the swimming pool fence on July 6 in preparation for a meeting with council officials for the Jesus Green working party forum.

After reporting it to the council, the hole was repaired the following day. Although a small thing, it shows how reporting incidents (even to the JGA) can get them sorted. Stopping people breaking into the pool is important not just on safety grounds, but because they then get bored and tend to smash the place up.

The JGA would like to thank Ian Ross and his team at the council for acting so swiftly in this matter and would urged members to continue reporting problems.

£250 grant for JGA

2009-07-10T21:44:00.002+01:00

After jumping through many bureaucratic hoops, the JGA has been offered a grant of £250 by Cambridgeshire Community Foundation. This is a body which adminsters community grants for the city council.

The money will be used to cover the general running costs of the JGA, including hiring rooms for meetings, publicity materials for said events, update of the website and various other running costs.

The grant pushes the JGA's meagre savings to a more acceptable level, although it's running total is, I believe, less than £400. This means the issue of subscription can be deferred for a while, although there is still much to recommend it. In short, the association would have more money to expand its activities, would be less dependent on outside bodies and it would also increase a sense of ownership among stakeholders.

On the downside, it would reduce membership and would be a hassle to collect given the city-wide nature of the group.

One of the requirements for accepting the money is that publicity materials must contain an agreed statement outlining the involvement of the CCF. A small price to pay for cash gratefully received from the JGA.

Hammerhead to stop impaction

2009-05-01T17:50:00.003+01:00

Council officers are canvassing views on installing a tarmac turning area at the Victoria Avenue entrance to Jesus Green

While this could partially solve the problem of soil compaction which can damage trees, I'm sure most people would be reluctant to allow tarmacing of any part of Jesus Green.

Richard has made a constructive comment on the JGA website, which I think deserves further consideration

If you interested in this and a host of other issues from the skatepark, bins, tennis courts, the big skip behind the pool and state of footpaths, see the minutes of a meeting of the Jesus Green stakeholder meeting by clicking on the agenda item on the right

RICHARD TAYLOR'S COMMENT

In relation to the "'hammerhead' tarmac area".
If an area is required, I would suggest one of the various techniques for strengthening grass areas which both them to be driven on allow the grass to grow through.

Along the backs many colleges have grassed areas strengthened by concrete which cars and large trucks park on without doing damage to the appearance of the area.

The front of Marshall's car sales area on Newmarket road has a plastic mesh in the grass which also enables vehicles to be driven on the grass without damage.

For most of the year in these areas you cannot see there is anything underneath, the strengthening is entirely invisible.

More details on Jesus Green tree decision

2009-05-01T17:42:00.004+01:00

For more details on the tree decisions for Jesus Green, Midsummer Common and New Square, there is a very thorough report by Richard Taylor on his website

http://www.rtaylor.co.uk/rare-outbreak-of-common-sense-as-cambridge-city-council-shelves-tree-chess-plans.html

For further information on the content of the plans, see :

http://www.rtaylor.co.uk/proposed-felling-planting-and-transplanting-of-trees-on-jesus-green.html

And for Midsummer Common:

http://www.rtaylor.co.uk/proposals-for-yet-more-trees-to-be-felled-on-midsummer-common-and-for-new-planting-to-encroach-on-the-open-space.html

Tree revamp decision

2009-05-01T17:29:00.003+01:00

JGA vice chairman Martin Thompson attended and spoke at the West Central Area Committee on Thursday night at the Grad Pad, whree councillors were voting on an allocation of money for tree planting, transplanting and some felling on the Green.

As it was not explained before the meeting that councillors would not been discussing the Tree Officer's proposals in detail, Martin prepared a statement on a JGA position which was read out. (However, I think it was useful to have our say as this is the first point of community consultation)

The upshot of the meeting was that £25,000 is to be made available over two years for tree planting/transplanting/felling work on Jesus Green and Midsummer Common and that once the council's new Tree Protocol (covering felling procedures) is made public in July, there is to be 'extensive public consultation' on the Tree Officer's proposals

Martin's statement was so good the JGA are keen on adopting this as our official position. He remarked there was a strong emphasis on 'structural planting' for the next 150 years which many of us will feel is too overblown and interventionist, and does not allow current generations to enjoy the trees adequately - instead future use.

Here it is:

30/4/09
Tree planting proposals for Jesus Green
Submission from Martin Thompson Vice Chair Jesus Green Association to West Central Area Committee.

‘Proposals for further discussion’ is what we hope and expect these to be. The guiding principle should be yes to careful consideration to renewing landscape for the long term but also any changes must serve the needs of the current generation and upcoming generations who should not be deprived of the chance to continue to enjoy healthy trees that have many years of life in them.

There is a major school of thought that says that there is no harm (and indeed some merit) in trees not being in straight lines with scattered planting. It seems to come down a matter of taste – formal vistas versus copses or drifts of trees- and to a certain extent, the fashion of the day can prevail, yet imposed aesthetic strategies have a habit of becoming rapidly out of date.
In the 18th century, Capability Brown was politely rebuffed when he came up with plans to turn the Backs into formal parkland and we must be grateful he was sent packing with a silver plate for his efforts.

Many of us must take an equally sceptical view of the current proposals.

All the proposals and the following key features of the Green in particular need very careful scrutiny and public input before any irrevocable decisions are made.

(As it was clear that councillors were not going to discuss the proposals in detail, I omitted the following points 1-3 but they may be useful to make later in the process.)

1. The Plane tree avenue
Much of the threat to these trees comes from poor drainage of the green, compaction of the roots by council and heavy vehicles servicing events.
We call upon Members to ensure that officers take the necessary steps to ensure that money is found to improve the drainage of the eastern field and also that vehicles beyond a certain weight or size are prohibited from this sensitive area where they have caused so much damage. Movements must be properly policed.
We would ask for an assurance that none of the existing trees will be felled unless they become a danger.

2. The Victoria Avenue chestnuts
Recent disease has shown these to be vulnerable in the long-term.
However, they may well shake off the symptoms and have many years of life left in them. It is right to start succession planting but the suggestion for a line of cherries/limes seems out of keeping.
Why not replant with Chestnut?
This is a reversal of the current action of planting new Chestnuts in the avenue in gaps, which is likely to win popular approval.

3 The cherry tree avenue running from Jesus Lock to Portugal Street
The necessity to fell any healthy trees should be challenged. The planting of the 25 new trees appears to be a prelude to the removal of the current avenue. The question is - How long does the current avenue have left. If it has another 20 years, why fell it now?

We would oppose any plans to fell the Green’s young and thriving oak tree.

In general
We would endorse the quote contained in the report:
‘It is considered unacceptable to fell a healthy tree with a long life expectation unless the community and members recommend that it should be removed…..
However an expression that give rise to concern is – ‘renew as required.’
Who is to take that decision?

No mention is made in these proposals of new planting that is needed along the Green side border of the pool. The leylandii bordering the pool should be reduced in height. This was to be part of the failed HLF bid.

Conclusion
Whilst recognising that managing the city’s trees is not an easy task for an under-resourced department and that public liability insurance is becoming more demanding, we call for far greater public scrutiny before any tree of significant proportion is felled.
Simply because a tree is not aligned or is of a different species to its neighbours should not be the justification for felling it.

I am told that felling can become the option of first resort as it is cheaper than having to maintain a tree that may have certain problems over a long period. This cannot surely be right.

Much emphasis is put on the notion of transplanting existing trees to give a more coherent feel. I would like to know what the success rate is likely to be and whether simply adding more trees to the planting list is more realistic (and may even be cheaper).

The proposal is to transplant three 20 year old beeches along Park Parade and two beautiful copper beeches and one other. Why replace them with trees similar to the others in a row just to get uniformity and the benefit of slightly smaller crowns in 100 years time?

Tree Protocol
We welcome in principle the introduction of a Tree Protocol but will have to reserve judgement until its details are made available and it is seen to be working effectively.

We would advocate clear descriptions of the council’s tree felling (and planting) proposals on the council website with space for comments. There is a lack of clarity on how and when decisions relating to these tree plans will be made.

We would also endorse the need to establish a separate ring-fenced tree planting budget and urge members to press for this.

Reasons for the rejection of HLF bid

2009-04-28T18:40:00.003+01:00

Here is the official reasons for the rejection of the city council's HLF bid for £3.4 million.

It was not successful because:

--'the level of new build within the application was disproportionate'
--'application did not provide sufficient evidence that the project would increase the range of audiences, conserve and improve the heritage value and improve management and maintenance'
--community opposition to the new build aspects of the bid

This shows the lottery people were basically on the same wave length as the JGA and those who protested against the plans - no grandiose schemes.

HERE IS THE STATEMENT - obtained using FOI powers

7 Cambridge, Jesus Green: PF-08-00662/1 PfPHLF 2009 (1) 7RECOMMENDATION: REJECT Cambridge City Council sought a stage one pass for £3,280,000 together with development funding of £106,000 (both 75% of eligible costs) to carry out work at Jesus Green, a 11.3ha public open space.

The Green had a long history and contained Grade II listed buildings and structures and well recognised features. The open air swimming pool was a popular and significant feature. The project would provide new park buildings, including two new cafes and toilet facilities, a community meeting room, a new entrance to the outdoor pool, and an adventure play area. Access improvements would include the development of a piazza, cycle route and a boulevard along the River Cam.

Letters of opposition had been received during assessment, with evidence of community opposition to the new build aspects of the bid. The Big Lottery Fund Head of Region had noted that the open space was already well used and considered that whilst refreshment facilities would be of value, the level of new build within the application was disproportionate.

The HLF Committee had agreed with officers' assessment that the application did not provide sufficient evidence that the project would increase the range of audiences, conserve and improve the heritage value and improve management and maintenance.

The Parks for People Committee for East of England had recommended that the application be rejected. Taking into account the contents of the paper and the feedback and recommendations from the Big Lottery Fund Head of Region and the regional committee, Big Lottery Fund Parks for People Committee and HLF Board recommended that the application for Jesus Green be rejected. - ends -

Jesus Green working party

2009-04-27T23:46:00.002+01:00

The initial meeting of the Jesus Green working party took place on April 20.

Richard Price, Anthony Bowen and Martin Thompson attended for the JGA. Other 'stakeholders' included Anne Page, from Don't Make it Jesus Less Green, rowers and Save Our Green Spaces. Friends of Jesus Green Pool had been invited but didn't attend.

While we have concerns about the rather haphazard way things were handled, this could be a useful way to lobby for improvements on the green. As we are the dominant group (150 members, an elected board and constitution, plus wide remit of concerns), I'd hope we have the strongest voice on this working group.

Council officers are now working out how much money is available to improve the green over the next few years. There was apparently £1.1 million of council cash available when there was lottery money on the table, but it is unlikely (given the council's recent financial setbacks) this amount will materialise, and certainly not for maintenance.

For example, officers have been asked to work out the cost of replacing the playground equipment in situ as well as costing a complete move to nearer the lock (as per HLF bid proposal - although minus the cafe)

The JGA has been asked to come up with its own priorities

The obvious one are:

Drainage
Playground renewal
Paths
Toilet upgrade
Tennis courts upgrade
Skate park repairs (and additions?)
Better litter facilities
New proposal for 'hammerhead' tarmac area for lorry unloading by Victoria Avenue.

Please feel free to leave your comments on what the JGA should lobby for.

Tree revamp for Jesus Green

2009-04-27T13:16:00.007+01:00

Some more significant changes for Jesus Green are planned - this time it's the trees.

These plans will be discussed at a West /Central Area committee at the Grad Pad on Thursday, April 30 at 7.30pm following a comprehensive review of what should be done.

The main points are:

- planting of a new avenue of 20 cherry trees parallel to the horse chestnut avenue
- the removal of six trees on the avenue running from Jesus Lock to Portugal Street to be replaced by 25 Tai Haku cherry trees
- the removal of 12 'scattered' trees in the 'nature area' area towards Midsummer Common to make way for the cherry trees.
-removal of scattered trees near Jesus College ditch (those not in avenue)
- a strengthening of the east to west beech avenue --- this will eventually become the dominant visual feature on the green once the London plane tree avenue fails and is replanted
- removal of leylandii from near the tennis courts
-infill of four London plane trees on plane avenue

These seem to be influenced by the somewhat controversial plans put forward by landscape architect Robert Myers in the unsuccessful bid for lottery money, which was turned down earlier this month. Basically, the emphasis will be on having trees in straight lines.

The straggling trees near Jesus College ditch will go, as will the 12 trees in the sort of nature area near Midsummer Common, as will the leylandii. This will bring a uniformity of sorts. Previous nature themed areas will go, instead there will be striking lines of trees.

Is this the approach we want for Jesus Green? Some people regard the informality of the green as its primary virtue, but the lines of trees do provide a certain definition to the grassed areas.

There will be concerns over the replacement of the Porugal Street avenue. This is a great collection of trees despite their mixed nature and works well. Should these trees be cut down for aesthetic reasons, especially if they are replaced by smaller trees (as happened on Parkers' Piece, to not particularly great success) ?

Not too controversial are the removal of the leylandii - they are not attractive and shield views of the green from people entering the green from the boardwalk. The other scattered trees near Jesus ditch could go too without too much fuss (many of these trees will be transplanted, not felled, as they are in good shape)

There needs to be a plan, but we need to think about if this is the right one.

Does the Portugal Street avenue need to go if it could survive for another 20-30 years easily? And can't it be informally replanted when dying trees fail?

Please read the entire document (about 15 pages) and let us know what you think

http://www.cambridge.gov.uk/public/councillors/agenda/2009/0430areaw/07.pdf

The JGA intend to address the area committee and anyone else who wants to needs to register a few days in advance

Minutes of meeting with Streetscene and council officers, 23.04.09

2009-04-27T13:05:00.004+01:00

BOWLS PAVILIONS TO BE KNOCKED DOWN AT THE END OF THE SUMMER

This was the one of FIVE meetings attended by the JGA in just a few days, so many thanks to Richard Price, Anthony Bowen and Martin Thompson for giving up their time to make sure we are represented.

MINUTES

Jesus Green Association

Matters for discussion on Thursday 23 April 2009

Present: Sarah Tovell, Ian Ross, Mac MacDonald, Anthony French, (Active Communities), Gary Quilter (Streetscene), Richard Price, Anthony Bowen (Jesus Green Association)

1. Damage by Circus and Beer Festival in 2008
(a) what is planned by way of reinstatement?
(b) why has this been so delayed? We note that it will not now be done until after this year’s Beer Festival.
N.B. JGA is aware that the Beer Festival is a very well organised event and that, unlike those involved in some other events, the organisers always own up to any damage done and offer to pay for it.

Answers: Major improvements for the Victoria Avenue entrance are planned including a tarmac ‘hammerhead’ with space for two articulated lorries to enter and reverse to a point where they can be unloaded onto small trailers, fork lift trucks etc. The idea is to make it unnecessary for large vehicles to go onto the grass. They will try to use the topsoil from this area to fill the ruts and dips caused by circus which will also be re-seeded. Timescale: could be done in next few weeks and at most by end of summer.
Costs and plans are being sort. Once these have been received they will be added to the list of priorities for Jesus Green (as discussed at the meeting on 20th April)

2. Trees. There is great public concern about the trees on Jesus Green and their care.
(a) when can we expect to see the promised tree assessment?
(b) what post HLF bid tree work is now planned - felling/replacement/new planting etc?

Answers: Diana Oviatt-Ham (Tree Officer) is preparing a paper on trees for next West/Central Area Committee meeting on Thursday 30 April for funding approval. This will include a modified planting schedule based on the Robert Myers report. ST promised to get a copy emailed to Martin Thompson.
Contacted Diana Oviatt-Ham to reminder her to email a copy to JGA
Robert & Diana’s report will be available shortly, some minor amendments currently being made.

There is a new protocol relating to tree work throughout the city. ST has been asked for a copy.
This is still in draft, again once complete it will be sent out.

3. Main path along Plane tree avenue. Urgent need for repairs.
(a) what news is there of discussions with County Council?
(b) are Streetscene committed to using small vehicles which stick to the path instead of swerving off it to
avoid pedestrians/cyclists?

Answers: A meeting with County Council has not yet happened but is booked. Streetscene were thanked for using smaller electric vehicles and promised to keep to the paths in future.

4. Swimming pool.
(a) when can we expect to see repairs to the fences completed?
(b) what else is planned to improve the appearance of the pool and its surroundings?

Answers: Fence repairs have been booked and are imminent. Interior of pool has been repainted and looks good. New gates have been ordered and will be fitted shortly. Pool due to open early in May. See Oviatt-Ham tree paper for more info about trees.

5. Skip by swimming pool hedge. It is an eyesore and has been there for far too long.
(a) When will it be removed?

Answer: Last year, Beer Festival people mistakenly put some of their rubbish in it contaminating contents but will be clearing it out after this year’s Festival. The skip will then be removed.

6. Children’s play area.
(a) when will damaged section of fence be replaced?
(b) Have repairs to the soft surface been ordered?
(c) Fill in dips where puddles form after rain?

Answer: Discussed at length. Damaged fence will be replaced. Some equipment is costing more to maintain than to replace. Much nearing end of useful life. Plans to renew the whole thing but where to put it? Parents like present position because of shade. This will be subject of consultation after the elections.

7. Skateboard park
(a) when will the promised repairs be done?

Answer: Useful discussion with users. Some repairs successful, others not so. Sensible suggestions made by skateboarders, listened to sympathetically by Ian Ross. This is now firmly on people’s radar. ST took name of James Walker (JamesWalker@gmail.com) who seems willing to come to meetings.

8. Signage on the Green. Consists of an awful mix of styles, many very scruffy.
(a) what plans are there to improve the signage?
(b) when can we expect this to be done?

Answer: There is no specific money for new signs but there is a city-wide look at signage on/for all open spaces by Active Communities.
There is no specific money for new signage on Jesus Green, but aware this needs looking at not just here but other sites within the city as well.

9. Area around lock-keepers cottage. Looks as is some welcome tidying up has been done. Thank you!
(a) future plans for this area?

Answer: response to this Q will be in the minutes of last Monday’s inaugural meeting of the Jesus Green Working Group.
Lock Keepers cottage owned by Conservators of the River Cam.
The area around the bridge is one element of the overall view of Jesus Green that will be prioritised with all other features.

10. Rouse Pavilion. Badly in need of repairs to prevent further deterioration which will be even more costly
to repair.
(a) when can we expect this to be done?
Answer: Repairs to roof, gutters etc will be ordered. More info in minutes of Monday’s meeting (se 9 above)?
Quotes for repairs being sort.

11. Rubbish bins. Hopelessly inadequate. No wonder people leave their litter all over the Green. More and
much larger required.
(a) Why have we got to wait for the results of trials? Summer is almost upon us and once again we are still
without adequate bins!

Answers: Temporary bins have been ordered and their deployment is ‘imminent’. How long is ‘imminent’. Answer - next couple of weeks! But they are needed now.

12. Bowls Pavilion. Attempted break-in. Dangerous state of glass door.
(a) repairs?
(b) please confirm date of demolition?

Answers: Door will be boarded up with plywood. Demolition due at end of summer.

13. Tennis Courts
(a) when will the promised pressure washing be done?
(b) what plans are there for the grass courts?
(c) Jack’s queries

Answers: Pressure washing - query re access for equipment but I think it has been ordered (Street Scene). Hole in fence by gate to grass courts pointed out & repair requested. A roller has been ordered for Parkside Cricket pitch and they will try to find a way to get it over to the grass courts. There are Health & Safety issues if volunteers try to maintain courts. There once were signs on the courts but they have been removed. replacements requested.

AOB

The City Council’s Enforcement Team has been out and about e.g. pointing out to people that instant BBQs kill grass if not supported above it

There is a meeting on Friday 24 April at 10.30 in Hobson Room, St Andrew’s Street. Richard Price will attend.

JGA website is more user-friendly

2009-04-23T01:02:00.006+01:00

I have modified the JGA site to make it easier to comment on stories - by clicking on COMMENT tag at the top of each story.

To email stories to your friends, tap the little envelope.

If you don't want to leave a comment, you can say if you think the story was good news or bad news - interactivity has arrived

In our ceaseless drive to reach out to the people of Cambridge, I've also added some interesting features along the right hand side of the screen, such as a daily quote from Aesop, Aristotle, Einstein and famous American presidents. The youth demographic is even covered by a daily
Harry Potter quote.

Music fans can also now enjoy songs from the JGA website by clicking on clips of modern pop songs and the hits by Rod Stewart

Enjoy

More details on EDF rejection

2009-04-21T17:53:00.002+01:00

An article will appear in Wednesday's (April 22) Cambridge News on the rejection of the EDF Energy, with comments from councillors, the JGA and EDF Energy.

Make sure you pick up a copy.

Meeting with council

2009-04-21T17:44:00.002+01:00

A meeting with Sarah Tovell and other Jesus Green stakeholders (swimming pool group, Park Street school, park parade residents association, etc) took place on Monday, April 20.

Will report back soon on the findings in the light of the rejection of the lottery bid and EDF Energy depot application.

Support the Great Cam Cleanup

2009-04-21T17:34:00.002+01:00

The Great Cam Cleanup will take place on Saturday, starting at the Fort St George at 10am.

The amount of rubbish retrieved during this day is truly staggering - and makes the river such a joy to enjoy.

I have enclosed a email from Camboaters chairman Luther Phillips, who is still looking for volunteers. It sounds like great fun and it would be good to see some JGA members getting involved.

FROM LUTHER PHILLIPS

Dear Friends,
The long awaited Great Cam Cleanup is nearly upon us, A BIG THANK YOU for all your support and help in advance of the day.
At the latest count over 200 volunteers have pledged their time to clean up and beautify our beloved river Cam and some of our most treasured green spaces. We aim to collect as much rubbish as we can find from the cleanup areas. River Care has kindly provided public liability insurance; gloves, litter pickers and refuse sacks. Streetscene will collect the rubbish and recyclable materials from the designated collection points alongside the river throughout the event.

Registration will commence at 10:00am at the Fort St George, at which time you can collect your litter picking equipment, sign in and have a coffee/tea or water & hot sausage roll, compliments of Gail at the Fort St George. Andrew Walters, the RiverCare Project Manager, will then give a brief health and safety chat, followed by our distinguished Mayor Cllr Mike Dixon who will declare the event open. Then it's your turn to express your environmental ethos, volunteers will be sent off to Jesus Green, Midsummer Common, Stourbridge Common & Ditton Meadows, the Backs, the towpath from the Penny Ferry to Baits Bite Lock, Baits Bite to Clayhithe and onto Bottisham Lock. In addition there will be small craft picking rubbish from the entire stretch of the river down to Bottisham Lock. The Paparazzi will probably want to have a photo call before the off, so don't be shy.

Please arrive early in order to make the registration process easier. Wear old clothes that you don't mind getting dirty and sturdy boots or wellies. If you plan to cycle, do check your bikes before the event and wear appropriate safety kit/gear. And watch out for the nettles!
Those of you starting at Baits Bite please arrive promptly at 9:45am, Dr Pip Noon of the Cam Conservancy will be there to hand out equipment and brief you.

We plan to terminate the event at 1:30pm, please return to the Fort with your equipment whence you can collect your BBQ tickets and indulge in the finest fodder cooked up by our gastronomic maestro Dave of The Cambridge Cheese Company.
If you have not already given me your name and plan to turn up on the day, I would advise you to email us ASAP to avoid disappointment; I will need your name for insurance purposes, barbeque numbers or you may like to let me know if you have any special dietary requirements.

For small craft/boats assisting with the cleanup from the water, make sure your insurance is up to date.

If you are a registered First Aider or would like to be a Team Leader do let me know.
We are creating a photo gallery on the Camboaters website, so please send your optimised photos taken on the day to the email address below.

Look forward to welcoming you on Saturday.

Thank you to all our silent partners: Paul Savoury - Tesco Newmarket Road, Nick & Co. at Treeworks, Whoover Swans by mike at blogshank.com, Steve & Tarquin - The Georgina Riverboat & Vic Lambert.

Cheers
Luther

Email: camcleanup@camboaters.co.uk
http://www.camboaters.co.uk/camcleanup/

EDF depot rejected

2009-04-16T23:38:00.003+01:00

It's been a busy week for Jesus Green.

After the rejection of the lottery bid on Wednesday, it has been announced the bid for a temporary compound on a section of Jesus Green behind the tennis courts has also been knocked back.

There has been virtually unanimous condemnation of the scheme. JGA members felt the scheme would be a terrible blight on a popular area for at least 18 months. Imagine a halogen-lit car park surrounded by 2m hoardings, with the grass destroyed by rolled-in hard standing and several trees in the cherry avenue felled. Not a pretty sight. An intrusive lay-by on Park Parade serving heavy lorries would have also been an intrusive presence.

There was also considerable support from Market ward councillors, in particular Colin Rosentiel in his comments to the Cambridge News, in which he invoked the green's common law statutes of the green to protect it.

Many members also wrote letters against the scheme, demonstrating a widespread resistance to the scheme to planning officers.

The JGA has now been informed by Simon Payne, director of environment and planning, that the scheme has been denied planning permission by senior officers under delegated powers.

The following reasons were given for the refusal:

1. The proposal woudl lead to the loss, for an extended period, of open space of recreational importance which would not be replaced elsewhere. It would also interfere with the recreational use of an area of Common Land. For these reasons it would be contrary to policy 4/2 of the Cambridge Local Plan (2006) and government guidance in planning policy guidance 17 'planning for open space, sport and recreation' (2002)

2. By virtue of its large size and untidy and makeshift appearance, the noisy nature of the activity within it, and its impact on view to and from the River Cam across Jesus Green, and towards the historic core of the city from the direction of Jesus Lock, the proposed compound would have a harmful impact on the character and appearance of the City of Cambridge Conservation Area No.1 (central), contrary to policy 4/11 of the Cambridg Local Plan (2006), and government guidance in Planning Policy Guidance 15 'Planning and the Historic Environment' (1994).

3. The proposal involves the development in an area with an unacceptable risk of flooding and has the potential to affect flows of floodwater elsewhere.

THE JGA WOULD LIKE TO CREDIT THE ACTIVE INVOLVEMENT OF THOSE MANY MEMBERS WHO MADE THEIR VOICES HEARD QUICKLY AND EFFECTIVELY. WELL DONE.

Also thanks to our elected representatives for coming out so firmly against this scheme, and also officers for moving decisively to knock this back.

PS, not sure what the appeals procedure is for EDF Energy, but there seems to be clearly laid out grounds for the refusal.

Also don't know any news on alternative sites for said compound.

Lottery bid rejected

2009-04-15T21:46:00.004+01:00

The eagerly awaited decision on the city council's bid for £3.3 million of lottery money to revamp the green has finally been made.

It has been rejected.

While opinion has been split on the merits of this bid, most members of the JGA have been vehemently against it. At our AGM on the subject, eighteen spoke against it and only one gave it partial support

The main concern was that the £4.4 million of changes would radically alter the character of the historic unspoilt green space, turning it into a 'theme park' consisting of segmented amusement areas(high wire zone, ornamental gardens, ponds, adventure playground). It appears the lottery committee has had similar concerns about the 'heritage' gains of the bid. Our argument was the high concept ideas behind the bid ran contrary to the historic 'countryside in city' character of Jesus Green.

Other concerns included plans to fell 59 trees for aesthetic reasons - they were deemed rather randomly placed compared to the landscape architect's vision of trees in straight lines. (Cllr Smith informed the AGM that they are not decaying or diseased, as she previously thought)

Over-development was also a major concern, with many members raising doubts about the suitability of a two-storey cafe on the green, a large piazza, expanded pathways and new paved areas. These will no longer happen.

The main question must now be the future of the green. What will happen to the promised £1.1 million of match funding promised by the council? And if there is any money, how should it be spent.

There is currently not enough cash to roll the grass tennis courts this summer (as they have been in the past), making them increasingly unplayable. How much would it cost a private contractor (or a nearby college) to roll them? Several hundred pounds at most.

Will there be money to fix the crumbling footpaths, the cracks in the skate park or refurbish the toilets? Or will cash only be available to grand schemes, like the proposed MUGA (multi-use games area), which have proved unpopular with users of the green.

And how will the council consult on these plans, given the less than impressive communication with us in the past.

PLEASE FEEL FREE TO LEAVE YOUR COMMENTS ON THE LOTTERY DECISION AND WHAT NEEDS IMPROVEMENT --- SKATE PARK IS CURRENTLY TOP OF THE LIST GOING BY COMMENTS ON THIS WEBSITE

Bizarrely, the Cambridge News has not posted its story about the decision on its website, so here is the council's press release on the subject

Press release from Cambridge City Council

Jesus Green, Heritage Lottery Fund Application

In December 2007, Cambridge City Council was awarded a Project Planning grant from the Heritage Lottery Fund (HLF) to work up a project for improvements to Jesus Green. Following widespread consultation, a stage one application was submitted to the HLF in September 2008. The bid, which comprised initial proposals and outline plans, has now been assessed along with 43 other projects competing for the £20 million of funds nationally available.

This week the Heritage Lottery Fund announced to the Council that the application has been unsuccessful. The HLF panel concluded that whilst the scheme had a number of merits, the proposals did not provide for the greater range of activities they sought and they were unconvinced of the rationale for heritage lottery funding to support the development of the proposed new buildings.

The Council is very disappointed to lose out on this opportunity for external investment in Jesus Green and will be seeking further clarification on some aspects of the HLF notification letter. The Council’s bid placed great emphasis on retaining the character of the park, in rationalising buildings and creating greater accessibility. However, the Council anticipates that further dialogue with the HLF will be beneficial in understanding the decision that has been made, and is grateful to HLF for funding provided to develop the scheme to date. In particular, the Council believes considerable benefit has been gained from the project development process via the engagement and interest of so many groups and individuals.

The initial HLF Project Planning Grant funded the consultations alongside the development of a master plan for the park, an ecology survey, archaeological report, audience development plan and tree planting proposals. These plans provide high quality information that will greatly assist in determining future approaches to Jesus Green.

In preparing the bid the Council made provision for match funding. This funding is still available to take forward some elements of the bid, such as improvements to the children’s play area, the renovation of the tennis courts; removal of the old bowls pavilion and a planned programme of tree planting.

Other key elements such as improving the drainage, improvements to the paths and the refurbishment of the toilets, will need to be given careful consideration and may take considerably longer to implement as alternative funding streams may need to be sought.

During the next few months the Council will be meeting with residents and stakeholder groups to consider how to progress those improvements identified as important during the preparation of the bid. This discussion will concentrate on priorities and solutions. Our focus will be on preserving the character and enhancing the amenity value of this historic and important public open space.

Quote from Executive Councillor, Cllr Julie Smith
"While it is naturally disappointing that we weren’t successful, the HLF project planning grant did give us the opportunity to do a lot of background research, not least in developing plans for future tree planting for Jesus Green. We will make use of such reports as we work with residents and others with an interest in the Green to ensure that Jesus Green remains the fantastic open space that everyone cherishes so much.’

Quote from Labour Spokesperson, Cllr Miriam Lynn
“It’s a real shame for all Cambridge residents that this bid was unsuccessful. However, I am pleased that the Council has prioritised further consultation with residents in order to make sure that future improvements to the Green can meet the City’s needs”.

Quote from Cllr Tim Bick, Market ward councillor:
“The failure to win any outside funding is not good news for lovers of the Green, which does need new resources to continue to meet aspirations. The important thing now is to work together locally to spend what money the Council can make available to the best possible effect."

Lottery bid decision delay

2009-03-31T19:00:00.004+01:00

Sarah Tovell at Cambridge City Council has informed us the decision on the HLF lottery bid has been delayed by the Parks for People department

Decision should now be announced on April 15

Lottery bid decision

2009-03-27T20:18:00.001Z

Keep an eye on the JGA website over the next few weeks as the Heritage Lottery Fund are due to announce their decision on the council's £4.4 million bid to revamp Jesus Green.

Decision is currently due on April 6 or 7.

Strategic document for 2009

2009-03-24T23:15:00.002Z

This strategic document was adopted by a unanimous vote at the JGA's EGM on March 17.

It lays out a clear statement of values for members and should be regarded as a 'mission statement' for the association in the coming year

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. Jesus Green is a most beautiful area - well-used, but a peaceful open space. It is of world heritage calibre and ranks alongside such areas as Central Park in New York and Hyde Park in London. Its relative size befits Cambridge and makes it jewel in the heart of Cambridge

2. JGA will oppose wholesale development of the green and, in particular, is opposed to any reduction in the grassed area, any reduction in the established tree population, large entrance areas, piazza areas, the widening of pathways to make expressways across the green, the building of space-age toilets and large two-storey cafes and segmentation of the green into themed play areas.

3. JGA will strongly support conservation, preservation and maintenance of the green. In particular, it wil support regular effective maintenance and drainage of the grassed areas, a comprehensive tree conservation and replacement strategy. It also supports maintenance, refurbishment of the tennis courts, the swimming pool, the children's play areas and the skateboard park. It also supports local events on the green, including the Cambridge Beer Festival, as part of an agreed and sensible schedule of events.

JGA will also strongly support the redevelopment of the Rouse pavilion to provide up-to-date cafe and toilet facilities and the maintenance of the riverside and brookside areas of the green.

4. JGA wish to avoid Jesus Green becoming a shopping experience or it becoming our own version of spaghettic junction, or even it being used to showcase the development aspirations of Cambridge City Council.

Jesus Green has served town, gown and visitors faithfully over many generations and the association believes the green must retain its essential character to serve future generations.

How to object to the proposed EDF depot

2009-03-24T13:35:00.000Z

Dear JGA member,

Here is the draft letter of objection to the EDF bid that was promised at the EGM on 17.3.09 Feel free to print it up and mail it. Or you can use the following link and copy and paste it into the comments section of the council website on line.

For this, go to http://www.cambridge.gov.uk/publicaccess/tdc/DcApplication/application_comments_entryform.aspx?caseno=KEG01BDX05A00

Comments must be received by April 6. If you have time, please take a minute to tailor the letter and add a few personal touches. This will be more effective than a standard letter, but either way, it will help

Director of Environment & PlanningCambridge City CouncilThe GuildhallCambridge CB2 3QJ Dear Sir,
Planning application 09/0087/FUL: Temporary site compound on Jesus Green
I was disappointed to hear about the plans for this maintenance depot, which will occupy a prominent area of the green for at least 18 months. This compound will be a noisy, ugly and intrusive presence on one of the city's best-loved open spaces. It should be opposed for the following reasons.

-Its location is wholly inappropriate and unsuited to this area of Jesus Green. It is a very well-used space, favoured by many families in the summer, and the depot would be an unacceptable loss of green space

-It is also wrong to sandwich a depot used for the disposal of trade waste (which could be toxic or corrosive) between popular tennis courts and a major pedestrian route. Children from Park Street Primary School also use the nearby area for PE sessions and lunchtimes. The application should be opposed on health and safety grounds given the potential risk to the public’s health.

-The application contradicts the council’s stated aims in its Local Plan. Policy 4/2 says “development will not be permitted which would be harmful to the character of, or lead to the loss of, open space”, while para 4.6 adds "open space is an essential part of our natural resource base, making a significant contribution to the setting, character, amenity and biodiversity of the city.” This temporary depot does not accord with this planning policy and should be refused.

-The proposal does not accord with policy 4/11 considering conservation areas, within which this site lies. Any new structure must "respect the character and context of the site and the surrounding area". With two towering portakabins, halogen lighting, hoardings and ugly car parks, it is hard to imagine a more ugly and inappropriate development.

-Access to the depot from the substation in Thompson's Lane would be through narrow, quiet, residential streets, with sharp corners, which are unsuited to large lorries. The streets are also used by school children and I would urge councillors to reject the scheme on safety grounds.

-The depot will cause lasting damage to this area. Not just to the grass, which will struggle to recover given the previous record of EDF on the green. Four or five trees will also be felled from in the avenue running from the Jesus Green footbridge to Portugal Street to make space for the depot. The whole avenue will then be chopped down on completion of the project and replaced with 26 cherry trees…”. I believe the loss of these trees is wholly unwarranted and will have a negative impact on the green’s appearance for decades.
-Similar to the views expressed by Market ward councillors, I believe Jesus Green is a common and should be protected using laws to this effect. I do not believe the council has the power to sanction this bid as it is not the owners of the land – it is owned by the people of Cambridge.
This depot is totally contrary to the council’s aim of protecting the city’s green spaces and the features within them. I urge the councillors addressing this issue to reject this application and ask EDF to consider alternative ways to deliver these facilities. Perhaps parking in Park Street car park could be used to reduce the need for this depot.

Yours sincerely,

Skate park update

2009-03-19T18:04:00.003Z

Skate park users might be interested to know the council is looking to improve the cracks in the skate ramp.

During a walkabout with all council officers and designers associated with Jesus Green, the JGA was told the damage to the ramp was minimal and could be rectified fairly easily. This is now on the list of council to-do items and should be carried out this spring.

Upgrades and extensions to the skatepark are also on a list of potential improvements to Jesus Green put forward at the environment scrutiny meeting alongside other plans for the green (see other posts)

Please keep posting your comments - eight so far - on what you want to see happen and they will be passed on relevant authorities to show there is demand for these improvements

Minutes of EGM 17/3/9

2009-03-19T18:00:00.001Z

Here are minutes of St Patrick's Day EGM at Wesley Methodist Church

Minutes of Jesus Green Association EGM

Wesley Methodist Church, Christ’s Piece, Cambridge 17th March 2009 – start 8pm

1. Martin Thompson (vice-chair) welcomed people to the meeting and conducted he election of the chairman. Peter Constable unanimously approved .

Chairman Peter Constable welcomed people to meeting – 50 people in attendance

2.Apologies – Anthony Bowen and Barbara Placido

3.Election of officers

Martin Thompson (vice-chairman), Richard Price (treasurer) and Jack Grove (secretary) unanimously elected as officers

Committee members Barbara Placido, Alex Buxton, Alan Fowlie and Anthony Bowen all approved unanimously

4. EDF maintenance depot

RP explained the plans EDF depot – area occupied, reasons for it, length of stay
Reported that Cllr Rosentiel and other councillors had opposed it vigorously, had also seen a letter from St John’s College against it.
Possible support from elements within council, who were planning to oppose the move

Described letter he sent to EDF Energy asking
- Why didn’t they do the work when the Thompson’s Lane area was clear, ie at start of hotel works? Answer said it could not be undertaken at the same time as previous EDF works "due to phasing issues of the construction".
- When did they start discussing it with the council – May 2008
- Alternative sites considered. Jesus Lane opposite ADC – not accepted by college. Ashwells site in Castle Hill – not feasible.

Four locations on Jesus Green all said to have been discussed with Cambridge City Council "and it was agreed that the site proposed was the optimum choice
Not clear what pre-planning advice had been given to EDF by the Council. RP had requested this at West/Central Area Committee meeting on 5 March. Still waiting for answer.

MT said he had been told by Active Communities that they had opposed the planning application

RP said council had tried to dissuade EDF from using the green, considered the legal status of the green (is it common land? Can council approve application), said the more people who objected the better

John Cooper – Anyone can make application even if they don’t own land

Susan Stobbs – JGA should take legal advice and threaten them with House of Lords, use the law to oppose it

PC drew attention to ‘excellent letter’ from Savills on behalf of St Johns

Jenny Cooper – is green common land. Response from Adrian Brink – yes, it had its own act of parliament

Question on who at the council agreed the plan should go ahead

Susan Stobbs – why is this base needed? Is it necessary? PC believed EDF probably had certain statutory rights when doing essential works

Questions over need for the depot raised by Roger Chatterton (extension), Richard Moss (low loaders) and JC (can’t they deliver direct to Thompsons Lane) – other comment: Can they use Park Street car park

Jo Scrivens asked how JGA members could mobilise support against the depot, suggested a standard letter that busy people could sign and even circulate in their neighbourhoods. Agreed that JG would draft and email a letter for people to sign and send off –deadline April 6. ACTION

PC suggested we get support from colleges. Trinity Hall, Magdalence, Girton and La Mimosa should all be contacted ACTION

Hazel Guest, on behalf of La Mimosa, said the restaurant would be affected by the closure of Thompson’s Lane and would oppose depot. PC said Maypole would also be against it.

Anne Garvey, of Don’t Make it Jesus Less Green, asked if the works were due to the new hotel. Answer, no, it affects half the city. Asked whether the area would be restored to former glory. PC said yes, however there was issue of felled trees. Jenny Cooper said replanted trees would not be the same. Comment that the whole avenue would be felled and replaced – no doubt due to ‘fungus and disease’.

Mary Burdett said Park St pupils would also be affected

Richard Taylor said there was need to suggest a plausible alternative and suggested a better site along the tennis courts allied with Park Street car park places. Peter Sparks did not feel JGA should have to come up with ideas, up to EDF. Jenny Cooper suggest tennis courts – JG asked about tennis players.

Adrian Brink asked who had been dealing with this at council

5. Lottery bid

PC said there was no decision yet, but it was expected soon

6. Walkabout with council and other plans

Martin Thompson detailed the February 10 walkabout. involving four councillors and seven officers. Issues touched on include damage to green from beer festival and circus and tree felling and planting policy. He will be pressing Sarah Tovell for a timetable for action on all the points noted and agreed on the walk around including more detailed tree felling and planting plans and also for details of the Council's new ‘event framework.’

JG described various plans for the green, including MUGA, informal games area, playground revamp, skate park improvements, tennis court, high wire zone, and how these had emerged. Lack of council consultation. RT added there was also biodiversity area planned. Various discussions on nature of section 106 money.

AG, who was also at walkabout, said there was now an obsession for having trees in straight lines and removing ‘native’ trees. Said tree expert Oliver Rackham believed the plain trees would live til they were 200 years old, ie another 40-80 years.

Mary Burdett raised concerns that green’s flood plain usage would be affected by development

HG asked for ramp in lido

7. Jesus Green working group

PC said he does not want it because it seeks to replace the function of the JGA
JC added he felt the council was setting up a rival organisation as relationship with JGA was uncomfortable

8. PC submitted a mission statement for consideration. Asked for line by line comment

RT said new adjustable intensity LED lighting should be embraced, while line should read ‘established’ tree population as council could say they would replace trees (with smaller ones)

JC was concerned about the ultra modern street lights, 30m tall

Calls for better drainage – it was once a great football pitch. John Lawton, SOS, called attention to compaction of soil, causing flooding.

Remove ‘mean-spirited’ comment about skatepark. Agreed. JG called litter problem to be addressed. AG said we shouldn’t pick up after litterbugs as it encourages them and normalises behaviour

Support for festivals on green. Beer festival representatives detailed the changes since moving to other side of green – some pluses, some minuses. Said £500 was paid to council after damaging tree. RP asked why that payment was never flagged by council, who had not replaced the tree or even mentioned where money was going

Motion adopted unanimously, subject to changes – put on website ACTION

9. Subscription and fundraising for JGA

RP detailed functions of JGA and why money is need and how it is spent. Council cash could disappear, and therefore need for new funding sources.. £203 in Cambridge BS, includes £40 grant from Council for hire of room for this meeting.
PC proposed that, should the JGA need to raise funds in future, all members be contacted and asked to contribute. Agreed unanimously.

PC said we needed to adopt a policy of non-discrimination in order to get funds from council – adopted by a unanimous vote

JC said rules on membership should be clarified. Motion that if you put your name and contact details down on clipboard, or contact association with them, you become member. Adopted by a unanimous vote.

PC closed the meeting at 9.35pm and thanked people for their attendance

Great turnout for Emergency General Meeting 17/3/09

2009-03-19T17:32:00.002Z

Thanks for all who attended our EGM on St Patrick's Day at Wesley Methodist Church.

A great turnout with 50 people showing up to discuss several pressing issues, including the proposed EDF Energy depot behind the tennis courts for at least 18 months.

Some excellent points were raised and a clear plan of action established ahead of the plannign committee to decide the matter. There were also updates on the lottery bid, details of other plans for the green and a summary of the walkabout with council officers in February.

Peter Constable has been elected as association chair, while Martin Thompson is now vice-chairman. Richard Price is treasurer and Jack Grove is secretary.

A strategic document or 'mission statement' proposed by Peter Constable was unanimously approved by the group after line by line analysis by members. This will be useful as a mandate as we continue the work of the JGA this year.

Minutes and the statement will be posted on this website soon.

EGM notification

2009-02-24T17:27:00.002Z

Hello everyone

Just a reminder that the JGA emergency general meeting will take place at the Octagon Room in Wesley Methodist Church, King Street, Cambridge on March 17 (st patrick's day) at 8pm.

Among the issues under discussion will be:

- EDF's plans to build a temporary car park/storage compound on the green for 18 months
-the progress of the £4.4 million lottery bid to revamp the park
-outline plans to build a multi-use games area, an informal games area and refurbish the children's playground (using section 106 money)
-plans to install picnic facilities on Jesus Green, extend the skate park and improve tennis courts
-possible annual subscription to boost dwindling JGA funds

There will be the election of the new committee members - which was achieved at the AGM

Everyone is welcome to attend and we need as many people as possible there to ensure we are quorate.

"Temporary" car park on Jesus Green for 18 months

2009-02-24T16:56:00.002Z

EDF Energy have submitted plans to install a storage compound/car park on Jesus Green while it replaces an electricity sub station in Thompson's Lane.

This will see the triangle of grass between the back of the grass tennis courts and the path running between Portugal Street and the footbridge covered with crushed harcore for 18 MONTHS.

The area will be surrounded with 8ft tall hoardings and will contain two two-storey portakabins, space for 10 vehicles. It will be lit by halogen lights.

Four to five trees on the avenue will be felled to make way for the area - apparently on the understanding that these trees are due to come down in the lottery plans (they are not). A new entrance area will be created by the removal of railings (which will create a temporary lay-by) while the green area will be built up to the level of Park Parade to allow access for heavy vehicles.

Needless to say, residents in Park Parade are not happy about this and are considering what can be done to prevent this. Residents meetings are ongoing.

Ward councillors have expressed some shock about the plans - discovered on a planning list by the JGA (no consultation from council officers or EDF, who haven't even displayed notices about this). Cllrs Bick, Rosentiel and Dixon have all said they were not aware of the plans til we notified them about them.
Cllr Julie Smith also says she did not know about the application, although was informed by council officers about 'issues' relating to EDF and the green before the walkabout with interested parties on February 10. As officers indicated the plans would not have met favour with planning officers, they and Cllr Smith did not feel the need to brief people onthe plans.

If people want to have their say on the issue, then contact the council

For more details, see the below link

http://www.rtaylor.co.uk/trees-to-be-felled-for-temporary-car-park-on-jesus-green.html

Colin Rosentiel's defence of Jesus Green

2009-02-05T19:30:00.002Z

I would like to draw members' attention to the actions of Cllr Colin Rosentiel.

He will appear before a city council standards board panel on Wednesday, February 11, to face charges of not showing due respect to a paramedic during a confrontation on Jesus Green.

The allegations against him relate to an incident in which Cllr Rosentiel tried to stop a number of vehicles, including an ambulance, from accessing Jesus Green on the day of last year's Strawberry Fair.

While th JGA does not condone any incivility towards members of our emergency services, Cllr Rosentiel's actions to protect Jesus Green from damage by cars is, in essence, laudable.

The green has never been used as an overspill car park for any public events on Midsummer Common and he was attempting to maintain that principle. The area at the back of the lido has been badly damaged in recent years by large vehicles driving on it and this should not continue.

As he was also responding directly to a phone call from our former chairman John Cooper, it is also unfortunate that his public spirited intentions have led to his appearance before this disciplinary adjudication panel.

The incident also raises issues over access to the green for emergency vehicles, which needs to be made simpler. Strawberry Fair should also remain solely based on Midsummer Common and there should be provision for emergency vehicles there too.

For more details on this incident, go to http://www.rtaylor.co.uk/councillor-rosenstiel-accused-of-obstructing-ambulance.html

Skate park concerns

2009-01-28T19:00:00.003Z

Some of younger users of Jesus Green have been in contact to comment on the plans

Several feel the skate park has been overlooked and needs improvement. The ramp's temporary planning permission ran out last summer, so it needs to be looked in any case. Whether it should be expanded or not is another matter.

Cinammon Francis-Burnett wrote:

I think its stupid the only thing they should do is redo the skate ramp!!! its stupidly dangerous because of the anti-graffiti paint. i broke my wrist skating on it and its just stupid because the paint makes it REALLY slippy. It also needs to be bigger, they may not realise it but there are loads of skaters in cambridge and when you go there to use the ramp its too crowded, with over 50 skaters sometimes. its a hazard and needs making larger i think.

JGA member Rupert Morgan has also contacted us asking for improved consultation with the council on possible improvements to the skate park.

Feel free to leave comments on this post

More plans to "improve" Jesus Green

2009-01-21T19:04:00.005Z

In a recent email to executive councillor for recreation Julie Smith, our vicechairman Martin Thomson wrote:

“We hope that a spirit of shared information and collaboration can be the hallmark of 2009 and, while we will do our best to achieve this, we also look to members and officers to encourage this”.

Therefore, the JGA committee was dismayed to find plans for several major projects on Jesus Green going before committee for approval - WITHOUT ANY CONSULTATION WITH US.

These were plans to install a 'high wire zone' , a biodiversity zone and expand the skate park on Jesus Green (completely separate to any lottery proposals), so committee members Richard Price and Peter Constable attended a community services scrutiny meeting on January 15.

It was here we learned for the first time that there are several ADDITIONAL developments planned for Jesus Green

These were:

- a £74,500 informal games area
-a £138,000 refurbishment of the park ---- both pending the HLF bid

+ a multi-games games area costing £95,000 and a £185,000 Jesus Green play area, which are to be included in a new procurement process.

All these items had apparently been put before a West/Central area committee and were now going before the executive councillor for arts and recreation for approval.

This was the first time the JGA had heard about these plans - despite the fact we were set up (using a city council grant) with the very purpose of improving consultation with the public over Jesus Green. It is quite staggering that these significant changes only come to our attention when they are being approved at committee level.

There is great disappointment among committee members that the spirit of cooperation and consultation promised by the council has not been backed up with action. Why was no member of the committe told about these plans?

Instead, we are expected to trawl through every line of the 450 pages of community services scrutiny report (which was admittedly in the public domain) to discover what they have planned for the green.

We have been assured that despite the approval of all these plans, this is only the green light so that consultation can begin. Can we not have consultation first? So plans are drawn up, officer time devoted to these ideas and it is only then that they ask whether people want these things. Surely this is the wrong way round?

FOR AN EXTENSIVE REPORT ON THE NEW JESUS GREEN PLANS, PLEASE GO TO

http://www.rtaylor.co.uk/more-threats-to-the-green-space-on-jesus-green.html -courtesy of citizen blogger Richard Taylor

Wooden pavilion

2009-01-17T14:47:00.003Z

The wooden pavilion on Jesus Green is currently scheduled to be knocked down.

However, any scheme to improve the green would not occur for at least another two years, so it will remain derelict during this time and is likely to be vandalised or defaced. Knocking it down would create an unsightly space unless a suitable landscaping scheme were introduced.

Could this building be put to productive use? Given the new spirit of partnership between the independent punters operating off La Mimosa and the city council, maybe it could be handed to them in the summer months as a storage or commercial space. If it is in proper use, it is less likely to be defaced.

It could also encourage the independent punters to establish greater supervision/maintenance of the tennis courts.

What do members think of this proposal. Or could it be used in a different way. Send comments to secretary_jga@hotmail.co.uk

JGA AGM main minutes (draft) 2/12/08

2009-01-14T20:33:00.001Z

JESUS GREEN ASSOCIATION

Minutes of the Annual General Meeting, held by kind permission of the minister and stewards of the Wesleyan Methodist Church on Short Street at 8pm on Tuesday, 2nd December 2008. John Cooper, chairman, presiding.

The chairman welcomed the many who attended – about 100 – and thanked the minister and stewards for permission to use the church itself.
Agenda had been posted, and were available on seats.

Apologies: Naomi Needs, Gill Simmonds, Anne Syfret.

There were no matters arising not due to arise.

Richard Price (Hon. Treasurer) spoke to the accounts. There were no questions. He thanked Victoria Zeitlyn for auditing them. It was agreed to seek the same auditor next year.

The Chairman reported the activities of the executive committee orally.
Five formal meetings had been held. There had also been several meetings on the Green and contact with officers of the city council and Cllr Julie Smith, executive councillor for leisure and recreation.
He recalled the terms of the association’s foundation: that it should work with but be independent of the Council; that it should encourage good use and discourage bad use of the green, seek its good maintenance and develop it in line with its existing qualities.
He noted the successful shift of the Beer Festival to a site east of the plane tree avenue, and thanked both officers and the festival organisers.
He noted the discreet use of their PA system by ‘Race for Life.’
He thanked Mr David Coventry, head of Street Scene, for attention to the grass and to litter; he thanked Anglia Ruskin students for helping to clean Jesus Ditch, and the boat people and others for similar work on the river bank.
He noted the period of heavy rain which made the green too fragile to take the circus when it came (it should have gone elsewhere); its lorry drivers ignored instructions.
Finally he noted the council’s preparation of a bid to the Heritage Lottery Fund for nearly £4.4 million to help refurbish and develop the green’s amenities. The executive committee had been able to comment in the summer and to achieve some modifications before the final draft went off in September (the timing had been unfortunate, consultation being difficult in summer); in particular the proposed diagonal path to the Victoria Avenue bridge had been dropped. Reservations were expressed about a two-storey cafe and increased lighting, and about the clash of pedestrians and cyclists on a widened towpath; the increased burden of maintenance was queried.
He then offered the floor for comments.

Nineteen members of the public, one member of the committee and three councillors spoke, as well as Cllr Julie Smith and Sarah Tovell, green spaces officer.
Some were for rejection of the bid in its entirety; some thought it over the top (‘grandiose’ was the word often used); others pointed to many items (18 were listed on the agenda in total) which needed attention.

Items which found favour among public comments expressed included
new toilets;
a move for the children’s playground, with a one-storey cafe nearby;
resurfacing of the hard tennis courts;
replacement of failing trees (chestnut canker is a spreading and unstoppable disease) and some new planting;
repair of paths
improvement of skateboard park
better drainagage

However, approval of some of these items also included disapproval of certain details; many opinions about the tree problem were expressed.

Items which did not find favour among public comments expressed included
a two-storey cafe;
a ‘piazza’ (for fear of too much suburban concrete);
a widened towpath (allowing faster cycling);
the ‘performance’ area;
stronger lighting (but the opposite opinion was also expressed).

Items not discussed included ornamental planting, a wild-flower meadow, an adventure playground, removal of wooden pavilion, hydroelectric plant

Many thought the consultation had been poor. Some queried the costings. There was much regret that the swimming pool was not part of the bid.

Cllr Julie Smith, supported by Sarah Tovell, explained the ‘signing off’ process, and said that the bid needed to be big, both in order to meet the HLF’s interests. They said it could be scaled down if it were successful, but not up. Some of the maintenance blight noted was inevitable in order not to jeopardise the bid while being made, but the use of section 106 money for more immediate work was not made clear.
The bid was at stage one, the stage of seeking support in principle; no proposal was bound to be implemented. We would know in the spring what support we would get, if any; then stage two would begin, a stage of detailed consultation; it would probably last a year.
Cllr Smith said she was willing to do site visits with any one who wished.

There were some further comments. The Chairman resisted calls for a vote as no suitable motion had been proposed. He observed that he would not be continuing in office, having done his time (Cassie Sparks stood down also) and put forward the names of Richard Price, Martin Thompson, Anthony Bowen (who represents Jesus College at the committee’s invitation), Alexandra Buxton, Barbara Placido and Allan Fowlie as Committee members. They were agreed.
Finally he urged all present to take part at least by responding as requested on the agenda, and closed the meeting.
John Cooper (chairman)

Footnote: 47 people left their details and some opinions. The predominant view is not dissimilar from the report above: there is much desire for maintenance and improvement of what exists, but great dislike of novelty.

NB Owing to irregularities which have come to light in the transaction of necessary business at the AGM, an Extraordinary General Meeting will be held at 7.30 for 8.0 p.m. on Tuesday 17 March 2009 at the Wesleyan Methodist Church by kind permission of the minister and stewards.

A summary of comments made at the meeting have been recorded in an appendix to these minutes.

Comments left in questionnaires at JGA's AGM 2/12/08

2009-01-14T20:04:00.001Z

WHICH ASPECT OF JESUS GREEN, AS IT NOW IS, GIVES YOU THE GREATEST PLEASURE?

Concerned that they amount to over-development. Don’t want the common to be urbanised

Good – toilet upgrade, new litter bins, the maintenance, general maintenance and replanting

Many good ideas – keep it modest and subtle

In so far as conservation is involved, fine

Reconsider the proposed hard landscaping – points 1, 3, 4, 7 – improve the ditch, not anything else

Let’s improve what is here but be careful not to add too much the built up area

New children’s playground, yes – adventure playground, no – two-storey café, no – smaller café at pool would be OK. Tree replacement plan (particularly for chestnut trees) is very important

Huge expenditure will, overall, give us a space lacking its current appeal, Consultation unsatisfactory (eg, Friends of Jesus Green Pool quoted as supporting – I’m one, but had no request for a view or info)

Please don’t overlook the skatepark and deal with the cracks soon

The money should be spent on maintenance of pool, greens, litter – perhaps a groundsman employed

The need for further community consultation and evidence that it has been listened to and taken into account

7,000 unique hits, soliciting 150 comments on website, is insufficient ‘consultation’. Scheme is over the top

Improve swimming pool, maintain greens, clean brook, rather than extra unnecessary things

Worth further discussion but aiming to have less concrete (performance/ piazza)

Generally very positive – too much negativity

Generally speaking in favour – one or two exceptions, no extra path, children’s play too close to Victoria Avenue

Good – without buildings

Some aspects, but too grandiose. New café is likely to prove uneconomic, new piazza a white elephant as well as intrusive. Consultation process was inadequate

The city council should maintain and refurbish the existing facilities, including the pavilion and lavatories

Please do not build a cafe or hard pave any new area as they presently would

Overall good, but piazza not needed. Bridge is too narrow

Maintaining what is there is more important

It seems unnecessary to apply for lottery funding when basic improvements could already be paid for

Some are essential – maintenance. I wonder why the council can’t pay for them anyway. All proposals to improve existing features are acceptable to me. Proposals that ask for building work or concrete area are not. I think there needs to be a lot more consultation with local residents.

I very much hope the plans will be scaled down should the lottery fund be granted. Jesus Green is one of the few almost ‘rural’ areas in the city where one can walk and enjoy solace. Do 59 trees really need to come down – also which ones?

Over-ambitious – nothing wrong with some sensible improvements, but far too grandiose.

Why was the renovation of the swimming pool not included in the bid? This very important.

Need to focus on improving the tennis courts – everything other is pretty much unnecessary, not enough consultation either.

I agree with some of the proposals, but am concerned about the possibility of some of the green space being overtaken by brick/concrete, etc

Concentrate on repair and maintenance of pool and green space

Too grandiose, too commercial. Jesus Green needs repair and maintenance: mend paths, mend skateboard area, improve playground, improve swimming pool and toilets and tennis courts: replace dying trees

Please make the future consultation more transparent

Agree with repair and maintenance improvement of existing facilities, but not with new paths, piazza and two-storey café and further concreting

They are the single most devastating proposals ever for Jesus Green

WHICH ASPECT OF JESUS GREEN, AS IT IS, GIVES YOU THE GREATEST PLEASURE?

The green open spaces
Trees, grass
Expansiveness, trees, use as a ‘village green’
Unstructured green space and pool
The openness, green space and trees
Open space and trees
The trees
The plane tree avenue
The fact that it is so open and green and therefore a multi-use space
The open green space for people to use as they wish
Wide open spaces
Trees, green space, paths
The green space and swimming pool
The informal, historic open space, which is widely used
Green open spaces
Sunday music concerts. Seeing tourists enjoying themselves in summer
Its permanence
The pool, the plane trees, the open mown grass areas
It’s a nice place to walk/sit, etc
The open green space, trees and undeveloped nature of this area
Swimming pool
The sense of open, uncluttered grassy space (well used) by multitudes of all ages
The avenue of plane trees, the open informal space
The greenery, the pool
Space
The diversity of use
Pool and open space
The plane tree avenue

WHAT ASPECT OF JESUS GREEN, AS IT IS NOW, CAUSES YOU THE MOST DISTRESS

Condition of the paths and heavy vehicles causing damage
Café, piazza, pirate boat and concrete
Poor maintenance of pool
The toilets are very sad
Maintenance
Level of maintenance, state of toilets
Lack of proper maintenance, supervision (eg, the main plane tree avenue gaps are still not replanted)
Litter, poor maintenance
Vandalised structures, eg benches, overflowing litter bins, damage to trees by vehicles constructing and deconstructing events
Rubbish in ditch
Litter/skate park
Skatepark/litter
Cyclists riding over the bridge, the bleak demeanour of the lockkeepers house, overflowing bins in summer
Maintenance
Poor drainage and maintenance, litter, damage by council vehicles across green areas
The pool, state of paths and loos
Toilets, lighting, play area, narrow bridge
State of paths
The toilets – they never feel safe or clean – and they are closed too early. The uneven paths make them awkward to walk on
Overflowing litter bins, neglected brook, poor condition of toilets
Stressed chestnut trees
The general maintenance
State of grass tennis courts, which are appalling, but could be wonderful
The poor state of the playground for my children
State of pool
Litter, barbecues
Litter, poor maintenance of paths, seats, loos
Poor maintenance

JGA AGM Minutes (draft)

2009-01-14T20:01:00.002Z

This summary of public comments made at the JGA annual general meeting at Wesley Methodist Church on December 2, 2008, will form part of the meeting's minutes

Full minutes to follow

MINUTES ---------AGM of Jesus Green Association 2/12/08
Anne Garvey, spokeswoman for Don’t Make it Jesus Less Green, said her group had collected nearly 200 signatures against the HLF bid. She added “We do not like the scheme or any aspect of it” Questioned the need to bulldoze pavilions and urged the council to “conserve and preserve”, rather than press ahead with the plans.
Daniel Zeichner said the scheme was “grandiose” and should concentrate on what was good about the green. Urged council to listen to people more carefully.
Andy Smart asked why the plans were not on the internet, adding the consultation had been “a scandal”. Said council needed to do more to keep in touch with people.
Peter Constable said consultation had been a “mess” and felt the bid was “greedy” as it was a too large a slice of cash on offer for the whole country. Added it would be “worst thing ever to happen to Jesus Green”.
Neil Andersen said he was “horrified” at the scheme. Praised the current green’s use for varied groups and was particularly worried about the removal of trees. Called for more supervision of green.
Rupert Morgan said the skate park was falling apart and should be overlooked.
Susie Stubbs called the scheme “over the top” and called for improvements to the pool as it was too cold for most people.
Bronwen Hipkin questioned why council tree officers had been excluded from preparation of plans in favour of external contractors.
Boni Sones said lido should follow example of London pools which are heated and open all year round. Said plans overlook state of pool completely.
Jane Tienne said green was regarded as a garden by many residents without their own and urged them not to turn green into a “commercial theme park” for out-of-towners.
Richard Cook called for better maintenance of the green instead of current plans.
Jo Lushley said green was used by all ages, but needed more maintenance, in particular benches which had been damaged.
Sean Munro said the scheme would improve the green for a diversity of people and benefits should not be overlooked.
Richard Taylor questioned Cllr Julie Smith, executive officer for recreation, as to why the final plans were not available on the council website, despite assurances that would be. Concerns that claims over ‘dying’ trees were incorrect as he inspected them and they were healthy.
Cllr Smith admitted aspects of scheme did not have public approval and therefore may not get planning approval. Said it would be irresponsible to play down the bid as it could always be scaled back, but smaller bid could not be supplemented.
John Lawton, chairman of SOS, wondered how the consultation had translated into the current plans as they did not relate to his input, which focused on maintenance.
Cllr Clare Blair insisted councillors had scrutinised the bid, but admitted she had not read the final bid in full. Said consultation was ongoing.
Cllr John Hipkin said the logic behind the bid appeared to be putting in for “as much as you can” and scaling back scheme when the council inevitably receives less. Urged council to keep the open space character of green.
Cllr Tim Bick said the green was the ‘live and let live’ green and felt “outaged” that people were trying to close down the bid at this early stage.
Other speakers raised issue of cracked footpaths, broken benches and nature of proposed performance area..
Clarifications on bid process were offered by council officers Sarah Tovell and Debbie Kaye. Meeting also attended by two PCSOs, green spaces officer Alistair Wilson and council leader Ian Nimmo Smith

Improvements to the tennis courts

2009-01-14T19:51:00.002Z

If the status quo prevails Jesus Green's grass courts will be scrapped when the city council finds enough money to concrete over them.
I feel this would be a shame as they have been enjoyed by generations of players and need only slightly more maintenance to restore them to their former glory/

This is a draft plan which the JGA will submit to the city council on the future of the courts
To have your say on them, email comments to secretary_jga@hotmail.co.uk

PROPOSALS FOR IMPROVEMENTS FOR JESUS GREEN TENNIS COURTS

Current state of Jesus Green courts

There are currently four grass courts and two concrete courts on Jesus Green. These are currently very well-used, particularly in the spring and summer months. The concrete courts are the most popular as the surface of the grass courts is not very good.
In fact, it has been practically impossible to play a decent, competitive match on some of the grass courts in recent years because the surface is so uneven, with the ball shooting off in strange directions if hit with any speed. The worse affected areas are at the back of the court, where reseeding is an issue, and most damage occurs.
Sometimes footballers have been known to play on the grass courts.
However, they are the only grass courts in the city and it is likely grass court play, which many find the most enjoyable type of tennis, will be lost forever.
Surface of hard courts is actually very good – court close to tree needs spraying with moss killer, but surface works well and dries very quickly. Replacement surface not needed as it stands.

Courts have been periodically supervised by staff from Jesus Green swimming pool, but last summer their visits were so infrequent that there is now the assumption that courts are free. This has sometimes proved a problem as certain players (mainly on the hard courts) play for hours without regard for others waiting. Often, these players are university students (who have their own courts), but the worst offenders are foreign students, who see no reason to move on after a reasonable session of play.

Other issues include footballers kicking the ball repeatedly against the grass court fences as they play keepy-uppies. Problem is exacerbated by the solid steel fence at the back of the court, which rings out when struck with a ball (traditional tennis court fences are made from wire, dampening the sound). Confrontations between tennis players and footballers are not uncommon as it is practically impossible to concentrate with frequent booming sound of footballs hitting the fence.

Certain corners of the courts have also been damaged by footballers and tennis players climbing over to retrieve balls in grass courts. There are also small holes where some people climb through.

Repainting of lines is also an issue. Grass and hard court lines are generally well executed, but could be repainted more often.

Nets are fairly old and have been vandalised or damaged. Grass court nets are in better shape and hard court nets from 2008 should be totally replaced as there are holes in them. There are also problems with adjustment of nets. There are no handles on net winders – unlike courts on Christ’s Piece – and often nets are very low. Improvised instruments (old cans, sticks, bottles) are used to raise the net, but winders should be introduced or available from Jesus Green lido.

Hard courts are also used for netball practice by Park Street Primary School and other youth groups, though not competitive matches. Nets need to be dismantled for this and reset afterwards – lack of winders makes this problematic for tennis players following netball sessions.

Suggestions to improve courts

JGA should liaise with city council’s maintenance/groundsmen about the preparation of courts – plan of maintenance (January to April) should be agreed. Should include rolling of courts and better reseeding of worn-out areas – mowing the grass is not enough in itself.

Procuring funds for new tennis nets – would totally rejuvenate hard courts

Attachment of net winders

More frequent painting of lines

Installation of signs asking people to play for no more than 30 minutes or one set if others are waiting. Signs outside asking people not to kick balls against metal fence – wooden ones (gold on green) preferable but cheaper options possible (metal with black lettering) or possibly just laminated plastic signs.

Efforts made to encourage volunteer participation in the maintenance of the courts – keys to grass courts should be made available to the JGA, equipment (including grass roller, brushes, rakes, grass seed) could be purchased/procured from council stores and stored in pavilion or Rouse toilet building).

Arrangements could be drawn up for supervision/payment in peak months.
This could be operated by lifeguards at lido or by trustworthy punt operator cashiers, who are ideally placed to collect court fees (suggestion: £3-5 an hour). Money could be reinvested in maintenance of the courts.

Greater communication between city council and JGA on plan of action for the tennis courts – contact established with council officers in charge of green spaces/maintenance.

Repair to the holes in court fencing.

Need to encourage more children to play tennis. Racquets could be handed out from lido at a cost (combined with deposit). Sadly, local youngsters do not use it often and best juniors playing there are foreign. Perhaps regular coaching sessions could be arranged there (subject to demand) and even a small tournament with prize could occur on a summer day – scope for volunteer participation here.

JGA should ask for access to the pavilion, where tennis activities/equipment could be based.
To be agreed by Jesus Green Association committee and submitted to Cambridge City Council.

JGA Emergency General Meeting

2009-01-14T19:46:00.003Z

The Jesus Green Association are holding an emergency general meeting at Wesley Methodist Church, off Christ's Piece, Cambridge, on March 17 (St Patrick's Day) at 7.30pm.

Items on the agenda include the election of a new committee, including the appointment of a new chairman (applications welcome), the HLF bid and beyond, and the future of the committee.

Planned improvements on Cambridge's open spaces

2009-01-14T19:17:00.003Z

The JGA has raised concerns that the plans recommended for approval at the city council's community scrutiny committee had not been shown to our association, which wasset up to improve consultation with local residents.

In particular, the main proposal for the high-wire adventure area was a source of anxiety as the general view of members was against such large capital projects, which would reduce the open space feel of the green.

We, therefore, requested the plans were deferred.

After several emails to Cllr Julie Smith, we have been assured that consultation will take place on the plans, which best match the section 106 criteria in the open spaces agenda.
They will not proceed either with the plans until the result of the HLF bid is known, which is likely to be in March

To view the relevant section of the committee meeting, see below. There is a link to the full agenda at the bottom of the page (proposals listed in priority order)

The Executive Councillor is recommended to approve the following items:
That the following ideas are to be adopted (in this ward based priority order) for inclusion into the Open Space and Recreation S106 programme.

West/ Central Area
1st
TW019/WC/D 'Natural Play Zone - Jesus Green' Natural play zone, introducing high wire zones & awareness of bio diversity
2nd
TW007/WC/A Additional Hard tennis Courts on Jesus Green
3rd
TW009/WC/A Expansion/Extension of Skate Park - Jesus Green

Other projects put forward for city-wide approval include: formal picnic and BBQ facilities in larger city-wide parks, exercise stations around open spaces (there is one outside Parkside Pool)
and Signage on green spaces showing distance around the green space .

http://www.cambridge.gov.uk/public/councillors/agenda/2009/0115cs/18.pdf

Heritage Lottery Plans

2009-01-14T18:59:00.003Z

Detailed plans of the £4.4 million HLF bid can be found on the city council's website.

To view the plans, go to http://www.cambridge.gov.uk/ccm/navigation/leisure-and-entertainment/parks-and-recreation/jesus-green/

Costings of the bid are not on the council's website, but are in the final HLF application. To view how much each element of the plans costs, go to http://www.rtaylor.co.uk/jesus-green-lottery-bid-document.html - with acknowledgement to citizen activist Richard Taylor, whose meticulously copied the figures from the final bid document.

Welcome to the Jesus Green Association

2009-01-14T00:05:00.001Z

This site is dedicated to all matters concerned with Jesus Green, one of Cambridge's most popular and best-loved open spaces.

If you would like to become a member of the JGA, please email your details to secretary_jga@hotmail.co.uk. To become a member please send your full name, address (including postcode), contact number and email.

We will try to update our members on all issues relating to Jesus Green, including the status of the current £4.4million bid by Cambridge City Council to the Heritage Lottery Fund to improve the green.

We also hope to improve volunteer involvement on the green, lobby relevant authorities for improved maintenance for key areas on the green and keep interested parties informed about any changes or events on Jesus Green.

If you have any comments on how the green could be improved and how this can be achieved, please email the above address with your comments